Page 2 of 4

PostPosted: Dec 21, 2003 @ 7:08am
by pixelator

PostPosted: Dec 21, 2003 @ 7:18am
by sponge
Wow, I'm surprised with the e805's showing. As much as the A620!

PostPosted: Dec 21, 2003 @ 7:25am
by bass_machine
I've got the Compaq iPaq h1940 (not yet listed)

PostPosted: Dec 21, 2003 @ 1:51pm
by Dan East

PostPosted: Dec 21, 2003 @ 6:32pm
by Chad

We Need VGA appz

PostPosted: Dec 22, 2003 @ 11:29pm
by Delarecal
You have to know that with the great advanced on devoppping VGA screen it will be more easiest for us to have appz on our VGA ! isn't it girls and guys?
Thnx a lot.

PostPosted: Dec 23, 2003 @ 1:53am
by Maf54

PostPosted: Dec 24, 2003 @ 9:16am
by Digby
With the larger VGA display on the e805, you owners realize that a game would have to fill 4 times the number of pixels per-frame compared to the other QVGA devices, don't you?

While some games aren't limited by fill rate, most are. Since the e805 is currently the only device out there with a VGA screen (AFAIK), why would a game developer waste time in making a 640x480 version of their game when the 320x240 version would still run on your device? In order for the game to run at an acceptable frame rate, game developers might have to spend a lot more time optimizing the game for the e805. I'm curious, would you be willing to pay more for a VGA version of the game to justify this work? How much more would you be willing to pay?

PostPosted: Dec 24, 2003 @ 6:36pm
by sponge

PostPosted: Dec 26, 2003 @ 3:43pm
by spyderbite
Audiovox Thera.. not listed

PostPosted: Dec 29, 2003 @ 4:00pm
by Cooldoud
so many e805 out ! I wish I had the money to afford one ;)

Anyway, I've got an A620BT, and I'm really pleased with its impressive horsepower :lol: !

PostPosted: Dec 29, 2003 @ 4:05pm
by Dan East

PostPosted: Dec 29, 2003 @ 4:14pm
by HobbesAB

PostPosted: Dec 29, 2003 @ 4:28pm
by hockeydude

PostPosted: Dec 29, 2003 @ 4:56pm
by Dan East