This site is no longer active and is available for archival purposes only. Registration and login is disabled.

lowest /highesr spec ppc?


lowest /highesr spec ppc?

Postby jim » Nov 2, 2001 @ 6:52am

High end / low end pocket pc devices (CE3.0+) processor based?<br><br>Basicly what's the slowest and what's the fastest?<br>Only interested for development purposes, not my device is better than yours etc.<br><br>Mainly interested in graphics processing.<br><br>Any useful knowledge?<br><br>cheers<br>Jim.
jim
 


Re: lowest /highesr spec ppc?

Postby Dan East » Nov 2, 2001 @ 8:46am

The Hewlett Packard Pocket PC 2000 devices are the slowest. I believe the processor runs at 133 mhz, but it also seems to have the slowest architecture as well. The iPaq was the fastest at 206 mhz. It also had the fastest memory access times. However, with Pocket PC 2002 the devices have become much more standardized. All PPC 2002 devices use the iPaq's 206 mhz ARM processor. I have yet to see benchmarks for the new devices, which would illustrate if one or the other performed substantially better due to their architecture.<br><br>Dan East
User avatar
Dan East
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5264
Joined: Jan 25, 2001 @ 5:19pm
Location: Virginia, USA


Re: lowest /highesr spec ppc?

Postby Luciano U. Werner » Nov 2, 2001 @ 8:56am

Dan, isn't it 203mHz?
Celerius quam asparagi cocuntur
__________________
DocSMRF
Tactical Advisor
User avatar
Luciano U. Werner
pm Insider
 
Posts: 3156
Joined: Aug 1, 2001 @ 9:41pm
Location: Brazil


Re: lowest /highesr spec ppc?

Postby jongjungbu » Nov 2, 2001 @ 11:05am

203MHz? Where did you get that from, Luci?
User avatar
jongjungbu
Not JongJongBu
 
Posts: 3112
Joined: Jun 19, 2001 @ 4:22am
Location: USA


Re: lowest /highesr spec ppc?

Postby Digby » Nov 2, 2001 @ 12:47pm

It's an Intel SA-1110 StrongARM processor that runs at 206 mhz.  More .<br><br>
Digby
pm Insider
 
Posts: 1011
Joined: Apr 29, 2001 @ 1:53pm


Re: lowest /highesr spec ppc?

Postby RICoder » Nov 2, 2001 @ 12:50pm

hmph...I didn't realize that the memory bus was 100mhz.  interesting.
<iframe src="http://gamercard.xbox.com/RICoder.card" scrolling="no" frameBorder="0" height="140" width="204">RICoder</iframe>
User avatar
RICoder
FOX News Correspondent
 
Posts: 3948
Joined: Jul 10, 2001 @ 1:48pm
Location: the matrix has me


Re: lowest /highesr spec ppc?

Postby Luciano U. Werner » Nov 2, 2001 @ 9:01pm

Oops, my bad. Must have mixed up the numbers.
Celerius quam asparagi cocuntur
__________________
DocSMRF
Tactical Advisor
User avatar
Luciano U. Werner
pm Insider
 
Posts: 3156
Joined: Aug 1, 2001 @ 9:41pm
Location: Brazil


Re: lowest /highesr spec ppc?

Postby jim » Nov 5, 2001 @ 6:37am

some benchmarks!<br><br>http://www.rojakpot.com/Reviews/Pocket_PC_Performance/GAPI_2.0/GAPI_2.0.htm
jim
 


Re: lowest /highesr spec ppc?

Postby jongjungbu » Nov 7, 2001 @ 6:04pm

None of those are inherent Pocket PC 2002 devices though.
User avatar
jongjungbu
Not JongJongBu
 
Posts: 3112
Joined: Jun 19, 2001 @ 4:22am
Location: USA


Return to Windows Mobile


Sort


Forum Description

A discussion forum for mobile device developers on the Windows Mobile platform. Any platform specific topics are welcome.

Moderators:

Dan East, sponge, Digby, David Horn, Kevin Gelso, RICoder

Forum permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

cron