This site is no longer active and is available for archival purposes only. Registration and login is disabled.

Quake 2 Ported to Pocket PC


Postby James S » Jan 12, 2003 @ 10:17pm

<img src="http://home.comcast.net/~sonne/james/tag.gif">
James S
pm Insider
 
Posts: 17064
Joined: Jan 12, 2002 @ 2:33pm
Location: Lexington, KY


Postby Entity » Jan 12, 2003 @ 11:55pm

Last edited by Entity on Jan 12, 2003 @ 11:57pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Entity
pm Member
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Jan 11, 2003 @ 10:10pm
Location: Milton Keynes, England


Postby Entity » Jan 12, 2003 @ 11:55pm

User avatar
Entity
pm Member
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Jan 11, 2003 @ 10:10pm
Location: Milton Keynes, England


Postby James S » Jan 13, 2003 @ 1:43am

<img src="http://home.comcast.net/~sonne/james/tag.gif">
James S
pm Insider
 
Posts: 17064
Joined: Jan 12, 2002 @ 2:33pm
Location: Lexington, KY


Postby Entity » Jan 13, 2003 @ 11:02pm

The problem with some developers is that they make 3D games too graphically 'good' to run smoothly. Quake 1 and Tomb raider run at 5fps, which is playable, but far from smooth. Racing Days may be smooth, but the gameplay is just turd. If developers made great games which run smoothy (15fps is what I call smooth) and look good, not brilliant, then more people will enjoy Pocket PC games.
User avatar
Entity
pm Member
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Jan 11, 2003 @ 10:10pm
Location: Milton Keynes, England


Postby James S » Jan 14, 2003 @ 1:33am

I personally enjoy 2D games much more than 3D. Developers are making games 3D just for the sake of 3D, when they could be 2D and run much faster and look much better. I enjoy Lemonade Inc. and Rayman Ultimate so much because they're beautiful 2D graphics and run very smooth. I don't have any 3D games on my PocketPC because they all run like an 80 year old man that can't find a rest room.
<img src="http://home.comcast.net/~sonne/james/tag.gif">
James S
pm Insider
 
Posts: 17064
Joined: Jan 12, 2002 @ 2:33pm
Location: Lexington, KY


Postby Entity » Jan 14, 2003 @ 11:02pm

User avatar
Entity
pm Member
 
Posts: 113
Joined: Jan 11, 2003 @ 10:10pm
Location: Milton Keynes, England


Postby swaaye » Jun 4, 2003 @ 6:42am

swaaye
pm Member
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Aug 17, 2002 @ 8:16am


Postby Datalore » Jun 4, 2003 @ 9:51pm

Yeah, can't wait until processors break that 50MHz barrier. Man my PocketPC will fly! Just imagine for a second, run Solitaire AND PocketWord! Woosh!
User avatar
Datalore
pm Member
 
Posts: 158
Joined: May 11, 2003 @ 1:58am


Will it run on my iPAQ H5455?

Postby Indrajit » Jun 13, 2003 @ 4:09am

Indrajit
pm Member
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Jun 13, 2003 @ 3:35am


Postby Robotbeat » Jun 22, 2003 @ 8:34am

Die, Palm, Die. If that offended you, then get rid of your Palm OS device.
User avatar
Robotbeat
pm Member
 
Posts: 827
Joined: Jan 28, 2001 @ 4:52pm
Location: In your mind...


Postby Robotbeat » Jun 22, 2003 @ 8:57am

Die, Palm, Die. If that offended you, then get rid of your Palm OS device.
User avatar
Robotbeat
pm Member
 
Posts: 827
Joined: Jan 28, 2001 @ 4:52pm
Location: In your mind...


Re: Quake 2 Ported to Pocket PC

Postby David-w-2o05 » Jan 6, 2006 @ 8:22pm

David-w-2o05
 


Postby -=( DOISFSG )=- » Jan 6, 2006 @ 8:26pm

-=( DOISFSG )=-
 


Previous

Return to Pocket Quake 1 and 2


Sort


Forum Description

Discuss Pocket Quake 1 and 2 by Dan East

Moderators:

Dan East, sponge, James S

Forum permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

cron