This site is no longer active and is available for archival purposes only. Registration and login is disabled.

PocketQuake Benchmark Archive


PocketQuake Benchmark Archive

Postby sponge » Dec 13, 2002 @ 12:32am

PocketQuake Benchmark Archive
Last Updated: A716

Reply to this post with any mistakes, or numbers I'm missing.

Feel free to use our information on your own website but only if you provide a link to the PocketQuake website: http://quake.pocketmatrix.com


Acer

n10 (300MHz XScale, WM2003)
12.8 FPS

n20 (400MHz XScale, WM2003)
15.2 FPS

n20 (472MHz XScale, WM2003)
16.6 FPS


Asus/Razor

MyPal A600/Razor Zayo (400MHz XScale)
10.3 FPS
8.7 FPS (Landscape)

MyPal A600/Razor Zayo (400MHz XScale @ 472MHz)
12.5 FPS
9.9 FPS (Landscape)

MyPal A600/Razor Zayo (400MHz XScale @ 200MHz)
5.3 FPS (Landscape)

MyPal A600/Razor Zayo (400MHz XScale @ 100MHz)
3.2 FPS (Landscape)

MyPal A620 (400MHz PXA255, PPC2K3)
18 FPS

MyPal A620 (472MHz PXA255, PPC2K3)
21.2 FPS

MyPal A716 (400MHz PXA255, PPC2K3)
18.3 FPS

MyPal A716 (472MHz PXA255, PPC2K3)
21.7 FPS


Audiovox

Maestro (206MHz SA)
8.4 FPS

Maestro (206MHz SA @ 236MHz)
10 FPS


Casio

Cassiopeia E-125 (150MHz MIPS)
6.8 FPS

Cassiopeia E-125 (150MHz MIPS @ 180MHz)
7.1 FPS

Cassiopeia E-125 (150MHz MIPS @ 200MHz)
7.3 FPS

Cassiopeia E-200 (206MHz SA)
8.9 FPS


Compaq \ HP

H1910 (200MHz XScale)
6.2 FPS

H1945 (266MHz Samsung)
14 FPS

H2215 (400MHz PXA255)
14.7 FPS

H2215 (400MHz PXA255 @ 530MHz)
18.5 FPS

H3630 (206MHz SA)
8.6 FPS

H3670 (206MHz SA)
8.9 FPS

H3670 (206MHz SA @ 221MHz)
9.6 FPS

H3835 (206MHz SA)
8.3 FPS

H3835 (236MHz SA @ 236MHz)
10.4 FPS

H3955 (400MHz XScale)
7.9 FPS

H4155 (400MHz PXA255, WM2003)
16.1 FPS

H5455 (400MHz XScale)
8.5 FPS

H5555 (400MHz PXA255)
14.0 FPS


Dell

Axim X5 (300MHz XScale @ 100MHz)
2.8 FPS

Axim X5 (300MHz XScale @ 200MHz)
5.8 FPS

Axim X5 Basic (300MHz XScale)
7.2 FPS

Axim X5 Basic (300MHz XScale, PPC2003)
12.5 FPS

Axim X5 Advanced (400MHz XScale)
7.8 FPS

Axim X5 Advanced (400MHz PXA255, PPC2003)
14.1 FPS

Axim X5 Advanced (600MHz PXA255, PPC2003)
17.6 FPS

Axim X30 (624MHz PXA270, PPC2003 SE)
24.2 FPS Portrait
18.5 FPS Landscape

Fujitsu-Siemens

Pocket Loox (400MHz XScale)
7.9 FPS


HP

Jornada 568 (206MHz SA)
8.5 FPS

Jornada 568 (206MHz SA @ 236MHz)
9.6 FPS

Jornada 720 (206MHz SA, HPC)
4 FPS - NEEDS CONFIRMATION


O2

XDA (206MHZ SA, WM2003)
11.1 FPS


Packard Bell

2060 (206MHz SA)
9.1 FPS


Toshiba

e330 (300MHz XScale)
7.5 FPS

e310 (206MHz SA)
7.8FPS

e550G (400MHz XScale)
8.2 FPS

e740 (400MHz XScale, old ROM)
7 FPS - NEEDS CONFIRMATION

e740 (400MHz XScale)
8.2 FPS

e740 (400MHz XScale @ 472MHz)
9.5 FPS

e750/e755 (400MHz PXA255)
10.3 FPS

e750/e755 (400MHz PXA255, WM2003)
14.9 FPS

e805 (400MHz PXA255, WM2003, QVGA)
15.3 FPS

e805 (400MHz PXA255, WM2003 SE, QVGA)
16 FPS

e805 (400MHz PXA255, WM2003 SE, VGA)
14.7 FPS

UR There

@migo (206MHz SA)
7.4 FPS

@migo (206 MHz SA @ 236MHz)
8.6 FPS


Yakumo

PDA Delta (200MHz XScale)
5.2 FPS

PDA Delta (200MHz XScale @ 300MHz)
7.6 FPS


Viewsonic


Viewsonic V36 (300MHz PXA255, WM2003)
15.6 FPS

Viewsonic V37 (400MHz XScale, PPC2002)
9.5 FPS
Last edited by sponge on Dec 4, 2003 @ 5:47am, edited 29 times in total.
holy internets batman.
User avatar
sponge
Not sponge
 
Posts: 12779
Joined: Jan 13, 2002 @ 8:04am
Location: New Hampshire


Postby NinthOption » Dec 14, 2002 @ 6:36am

NinthOption
pm Member
 
Posts: 168
Joined: Dec 2, 2002 @ 6:10am
Location: Everywhere you want to be


Postby sponge » Dec 14, 2002 @ 6:41pm

holy internets batman.
User avatar
sponge
Not sponge
 
Posts: 12779
Joined: Jan 13, 2002 @ 8:04am
Location: New Hampshire


Postby James S » Dec 14, 2002 @ 10:43pm

<img src="http://home.comcast.net/~sonne/james/tag.gif">
James S
pm Insider
 
Posts: 17064
Joined: Jan 12, 2002 @ 2:33pm
Location: Lexington, KY


PocketQuake Benchmark Archive

Postby eminefes » Dec 17, 2002 @ 5:12am

Two cupcakes were in an oven. One turned to the other and said "Damn, it sure is hot in here" and the other one said "HOLY SHIT! A TALKING CUPCAKE!"
User avatar
eminefes
pm Insider
 
Posts: 1353
Joined: Jun 24, 2001 @ 7:21pm
Location: Jacksonville, Florida


Postby sponge » Dec 17, 2002 @ 6:07am

holy internets batman.
User avatar
sponge
Not sponge
 
Posts: 12779
Joined: Jan 13, 2002 @ 8:04am
Location: New Hampshire


Postby Dan East » Dec 23, 2002 @ 3:01am

User avatar
Dan East
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5264
Joined: Jan 25, 2001 @ 5:19pm
Location: Virginia, USA


Postby James S » Dec 23, 2002 @ 3:25am

<img src="http://home.comcast.net/~sonne/james/tag.gif">
James S
pm Insider
 
Posts: 17064
Joined: Jan 12, 2002 @ 2:33pm
Location: Lexington, KY


Postby Mali » Dec 23, 2002 @ 9:01pm

Mali
pm Member
 
Posts: 81
Joined: Feb 28, 2001 @ 4:41pm


Postby sponge » Dec 24, 2002 @ 12:41am

holy internets batman.
User avatar
sponge
Not sponge
 
Posts: 12779
Joined: Jan 13, 2002 @ 8:04am
Location: New Hampshire


Postby James S » Dec 24, 2002 @ 3:57am

<img src="http://home.comcast.net/~sonne/james/tag.gif">
James S
pm Insider
 
Posts: 17064
Joined: Jan 12, 2002 @ 2:33pm
Location: Lexington, KY


Postby sponge » Dec 24, 2002 @ 4:12am

holy internets batman.
User avatar
sponge
Not sponge
 
Posts: 12779
Joined: Jan 13, 2002 @ 8:04am
Location: New Hampshire


Postby Robotbeat » Dec 24, 2002 @ 7:31pm

I can benchmark my e115!

On my e115, it doesn't really make much difference how detailed the textures are (until I get a memory over-run warning!), the performance seems to be about the same. Why don't we have Casio on that list?

When I get the chance, I'll bench my e115 Casio. I might as well hard-reset it, since it was recently hard-reset anyways.

See ya!
Die, Palm, Die. If that offended you, then get rid of your Palm OS device.
User avatar
Robotbeat
pm Member
 
Posts: 827
Joined: Jan 28, 2001 @ 4:52pm
Location: In your mind...


Postby sponge » Dec 24, 2002 @ 7:38pm

No Casios on that list simply because I couldn't find any :P

Try to reduce the changes as much as possible, and grab different benchmarks for portrait and landscape. Thanks for the support!
holy internets batman.
User avatar
sponge
Not sponge
 
Posts: 12779
Joined: Jan 13, 2002 @ 8:04am
Location: New Hampshire


Postby James S » Dec 24, 2002 @ 11:05pm

I think my Casio E-125 got 6.8FPS at 150MHz, at increased another 0.1FPS for every 10 MHz I overclocked. So at 180MHz I got 7.2, at 200 I received 7.5 I think.

I'm giving my E-125 to my 21 year old brother in Orlando as a Christmas present, so it's wrapped under the tree, thus I cannot benchmark it. But I'm 93% positive that those are the numbers for the Casio E-125. I'll add those numbers for the moment.
<img src="http://home.comcast.net/~sonne/james/tag.gif">
James S
pm Insider
 
Posts: 17064
Joined: Jan 12, 2002 @ 2:33pm
Location: Lexington, KY


Next

Return to Pocket Quake 1 and 2


Sort


Forum Description

Discuss Pocket Quake 1 and 2 by Dan East

Moderators:

Dan East, sponge, James S

Forum permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

cron