Welcome to PocketMatrix.com, a Mobile Devices enthusiast website. If you're a developer, be sure to check out our developer forums.
You can change your sidebar preferences in your Profile.

 Home | FAQ | Search | Memberlist | Usergroups | Profile | Log in to check your private messages | Log in | Register 
Pocket Quake 1 and 2
PocketQuake Benchmark Archive

Page 1 of 20 | Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 18, 19, 20  Next [ Post new topic ] [ Reply ]
PostPosted: Thu Dec 12, 2002 11:32 pm | Post subject: PocketQuake Benchmark Archive
sponge
Not sponge


Joined: 13 Jan 2002
Posts: 13073
Location: Connecticut, USA

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

MSN Messenger

PocketQuake Benchmark Archive
Last Updated: A716

Reply to this post with any mistakes, or numbers I'm missing.

Feel free to use our information on your own website but only if you provide a link to the PocketQuake website: http://quake.pocketmatrix.com


Acer

n10 (300MHz XScale, WM2003)
12.8 FPS

n20 (400MHz XScale, WM2003)
15.2 FPS

n20 (472MHz XScale, WM2003)
16.6 FPS


Asus/Razor

MyPal A600/Razor Zayo (400MHz XScale)
10.3 FPS
8.7 FPS (Landscape)

MyPal A600/Razor Zayo (400MHz XScale @ 472MHz)
12.5 FPS
9.9 FPS (Landscape)

MyPal A600/Razor Zayo (400MHz XScale @ 200MHz)
5.3 FPS (Landscape)

MyPal A600/Razor Zayo (400MHz XScale @ 100MHz)
3.2 FPS (Landscape)

MyPal A620 (400MHz PXA255, PPC2K3)
18 FPS

MyPal A620 (472MHz PXA255, PPC2K3)
21.2 FPS

MyPal A716 (400MHz PXA255, PPC2K3)
18.3 FPS

MyPal A716 (472MHz PXA255, PPC2K3)
21.7 FPS


Audiovox

Maestro (206MHz SA)
8.4 FPS

Maestro (206MHz SA @ 236MHz)
10 FPS


Casio

Cassiopeia E-125 (150MHz MIPS)
6.8 FPS

Cassiopeia E-125 (150MHz MIPS @ 180MHz)
7.1 FPS

Cassiopeia E-125 (150MHz MIPS @ 200MHz)
7.3 FPS

Cassiopeia E-200 (206MHz SA)
8.9 FPS


Compaq \ HP

H1910 (200MHz XScale)
6.2 FPS

H1945 (266MHz Samsung)
14 FPS

H2215 (400MHz PXA255)
14.7 FPS

H2215 (400MHz PXA255 @ 530MHz)
18.5 FPS

H3630 (206MHz SA)
8.6 FPS

H3670 (206MHz SA)
8.9 FPS

H3670 (206MHz SA @ 221MHz)
9.6 FPS

H3835 (206MHz SA)
8.3 FPS

H3835 (236MHz SA @ 236MHz)
10.4 FPS

H3955 (400MHz XScale)
7.9 FPS

H4155 (400MHz PXA255, WM2003)
16.1 FPS

H5455 (400MHz XScale)
8.5 FPS

H5555 (400MHz PXA255)
14.0 FPS


Dell

Axim X5 (300MHz XScale @ 100MHz)
2.8 FPS

Axim X5 (300MHz XScale @ 200MHz)
5.8 FPS

Axim X5 Basic (300MHz XScale)
7.2 FPS

Axim X5 Basic (300MHz XScale, PPC2003)
12.5 FPS

Axim X5 Advanced (400MHz XScale)
7.8 FPS

Axim X5 Advanced (400MHz PXA255, PPC2003)
14.1 FPS

Axim X5 Advanced (600MHz PXA255, PPC2003)
17.6 FPS

Axim X30 (624MHz PXA270, PPC2003 SE)
24.2 FPS Portrait
18.5 FPS Landscape

Fujitsu-Siemens

Pocket Loox (400MHz XScale)
7.9 FPS


HP

Jornada 568 (206MHz SA)
8.5 FPS

Jornada 568 (206MHz SA @ 236MHz)
9.6 FPS

Jornada 720 (206MHz SA, HPC)
4 FPS - NEEDS CONFIRMATION


O2

XDA (206MHZ SA, WM2003)
11.1 FPS


Packard Bell

2060 (206MHz SA)
9.1 FPS


Toshiba

e330 (300MHz XScale)
7.5 FPS

e310 (206MHz SA)
7.8FPS

e550G (400MHz XScale)
8.2 FPS

e740 (400MHz XScale, old ROM)
7 FPS - NEEDS CONFIRMATION

e740 (400MHz XScale)
8.2 FPS

e740 (400MHz XScale @ 472MHz)
9.5 FPS

e750/e755 (400MHz PXA255)
10.3 FPS

e750/e755 (400MHz PXA255, WM2003)
14.9 FPS

e805 (400MHz PXA255, WM2003, QVGA)
15.3 FPS

e805 (400MHz PXA255, WM2003 SE, QVGA)
16 FPS

e805 (400MHz PXA255, WM2003 SE, VGA)
14.7 FPS

UR There

@migo (206MHz SA)
7.4 FPS

@migo (206 MHz SA @ 236MHz)
8.6 FPS


Yakumo

PDA Delta (200MHz XScale)
5.2 FPS

PDA Delta (200MHz XScale @ 300MHz)
7.6 FPS


Viewsonic


Viewsonic V36 (300MHz PXA255, WM2003)
15.6 FPS

Viewsonic V37 (400MHz XScale, PPC2002)
9.5 FPS


_________________
holy internets batman.
Reply with quote


Last edited by sponge on Thu Dec 04, 2003 4:47 am; edited 29 times in total
PostPosted: Sat Dec 14, 2002 5:36 am | Post subject:
NinthOption
pm Member


Joined: 02 Dec 2002
Posts: 169
Location: Everywhere you want to be

View user's profile Send private message



Does anyone have a bench of PQ on a zarus?(I know there's a port)

Reply with quote
PostPosted: Sat Dec 14, 2002 5:41 pm | Post subject:
sponge
Not sponge


Joined: 13 Jan 2002
Posts: 13073
Location: Connecticut, USA

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

MSN Messenger

Well damn.. when I edit the post, it becomes unsticky.. CURSE YOU POCKETMATRIX/phpBB!


_________________
holy internets batman.
Reply with quote
PostPosted: Sat Dec 14, 2002 9:43 pm | Post subject:
James S
pm Insider


Joined: 12 Jan 2002
Posts: 17294
Location: Lexington, KY

View user's profile Send private message

AIM Address

I got it, don't worry, edit away. I'm here to serve.


_________________
<img src="http://home.comcast.net/~sonne/james/tag.gif">
Reply with quote
PostPosted: Tue Dec 17, 2002 4:12 am | Post subject: PocketQuake Benchmark Archive
eminefes
pm Insider


Joined: 24 Jun 2001
Posts: 1354
Location: Jacksonville, Florida

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail




sponge wrote:


Toshiba

e310 (206MHz SA)
7.8FPS - NEEDS CONFIRMATION




Here's your confirmation. Very Happy

My e310 did achieve 7.8fps.


_________________
Two cupcakes were in an oven. One turned to the other and said "Damn, it sure is hot in here" and the other one said "HOLY SHIT! A TALKING CUPCAKE!"
Reply with quote
PostPosted: Tue Dec 17, 2002 5:07 am | Post subject:
sponge
Not sponge


Joined: 13 Jan 2002
Posts: 13073
Location: Connecticut, USA

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

MSN Messenger

Thanks. Has been fixed.


_________________
holy internets batman.
Reply with quote
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2002 2:01 am | Post subject:
Dan East
Site Admin


Joined: 25 Jan 2001
Posts: 5208
Location: Virginia, USA

View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website



It would be very good to have a set of landscape / fullscreen benchmarks as well for a couple reasons. In portrait mode less than 1/2 of the screen is blitted every frame (the onscreen controls and taskbar are not redrawn each frame), while in landscape the entire display is blitted each frame.

Also, the portrait mode uses a non-standard resolution that the PC version doesn't support. The landscape mode is 320x240, which corresponds to a PC version mode, for direct comparison.

Dan East

Reply with quote
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2002 2:25 am | Post subject:
James S
pm Insider


Joined: 12 Jan 2002
Posts: 17294
Location: Lexington, KY

View user's profile Send private message

AIM Address

sponge, are you up for the challenge?


_________________
<img src="http://home.comcast.net/~sonne/james/tag.gif">
Reply with quote
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2002 8:01 pm | Post subject:
Mali
pm Member


Joined: 28 Feb 2001
Posts: 81


View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail



results for asus a600 in landscape(right):

demo1.dem: 8.7 fps

Reply with quote
PostPosted: Mon Dec 23, 2002 11:41 pm | Post subject:
sponge
Not sponge


Joined: 13 Jan 2002
Posts: 13073
Location: Connecticut, USA

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

MSN Messenger

Sure. The problem is, I skimmed (as in find, not read quickly) these benchmarks throughout the forum, and had no mention of orientation. But I'll update the results accordingly, even if it is all unknown orientations.

I thought the performance hit between landscape/portrait were minimal?


_________________
holy internets batman.
Reply with quote
PostPosted: Tue Dec 24, 2002 2:57 am | Post subject:
James S
pm Insider


Joined: 12 Jan 2002
Posts: 17294
Location: Lexington, KY

View user's profile Send private message

AIM Address

Not at all! There is a HUGE difference. Check out the POLL Dan made in the General PPC Discussion forum for an indepth explanation.


_________________
<img src="http://home.comcast.net/~sonne/james/tag.gif">
Reply with quote
PostPosted: Tue Dec 24, 2002 3:12 am | Post subject:
sponge
Not sponge


Joined: 13 Jan 2002
Posts: 13073
Location: Connecticut, USA

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

MSN Messenger

I see that, but I was always under the impression that PQ is CPU limited, not on the renderer as much as it is sound, AI, game logic and the such. Same reason as why you can pump up the resolution on games that are too slow on your PC, without making them slower. (ie RTCW on my old 233, almost the same fps with r_mipmap 1 and r_mipmap 4)


_________________
holy internets batman.
Reply with quote
PostPosted: Tue Dec 24, 2002 6:31 pm | Post subject:
Robotbeat
pm Member


Joined: 28 Jan 2001
Posts: 880
Location: In your mind...

View user's profile Send private message



I can benchmark my e115!

On my e115, it doesn't really make much difference how detailed the textures are (until I get a memory over-run warning!), the performance seems to be about the same. Why don't we have Casio on that list?

When I get the chance, I'll bench my e115 Casio. I might as well hard-reset it, since it was recently hard-reset anyways.

See ya!


_________________
Die, Palm, Die. If that offended you, then get rid of your Palm OS device.
Reply with quote
PostPosted: Tue Dec 24, 2002 6:38 pm | Post subject:
sponge
Not sponge


Joined: 13 Jan 2002
Posts: 13073
Location: Connecticut, USA

View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail

MSN Messenger

No Casios on that list simply because I couldn't find any :P

Try to reduce the changes as much as possible, and grab different benchmarks for portrait and landscape. Thanks for the support!


_________________
holy internets batman.
Reply with quote
PostPosted: Tue Dec 24, 2002 10:05 pm | Post subject:
James S
pm Insider


Joined: 12 Jan 2002
Posts: 17294
Location: Lexington, KY

View user's profile Send private message

AIM Address

I think my Casio E-125 got 6.8FPS at 150MHz, at increased another 0.1FPS for every 10 MHz I overclocked. So at 180MHz I got 7.2, at 200 I received 7.5 I think.

I'm giving my E-125 to my 21 year old brother in Orlando as a Christmas present, so it's wrapped under the tree, thus I cannot benchmark it. But I'm 93% positive that those are the numbers for the Casio E-125. I'll add those numbers for the moment.


_________________
<img src="http://home.comcast.net/~sonne/james/tag.gif">
Reply with quote
[ Post new topic ] [ Reply ] Page 1 of 20 | Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 18, 19, 20  Next
Display posts from previous:
All times are GMT
Jump to:  

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum