 Posted: Thu Dec 12, 2002 11:32 pm | Post subject: PocketQuake Benchmark Archive |
|
sponge
Not sponge
Joined: 13 Jan 2002
Posts: 13073
Location: Connecticut, USA
  
|
PocketQuake Benchmark Archive
Last Updated: A716
Reply to this post with any mistakes, or numbers I'm missing.
Feel free to use our information on your own website but only if you provide a link to the PocketQuake website: http://quake.pocketmatrix.com
Acer
n10 (300MHz XScale, WM2003)
12.8 FPS
n20 (400MHz XScale, WM2003)
15.2 FPS
n20 (472MHz XScale, WM2003)
16.6 FPS
Asus/Razor
MyPal A600/Razor Zayo (400MHz XScale)
10.3 FPS
8.7 FPS (Landscape)
MyPal A600/Razor Zayo (400MHz XScale @ 472MHz)
12.5 FPS
9.9 FPS (Landscape)
MyPal A600/Razor Zayo (400MHz XScale @ 200MHz)
5.3 FPS (Landscape)
MyPal A600/Razor Zayo (400MHz XScale @ 100MHz)
3.2 FPS (Landscape)
MyPal A620 (400MHz PXA255, PPC2K3)
18 FPS
MyPal A620 (472MHz PXA255, PPC2K3)
21.2 FPS
MyPal A716 (400MHz PXA255, PPC2K3)
18.3 FPS
MyPal A716 (472MHz PXA255, PPC2K3)
21.7 FPS
Audiovox
Maestro (206MHz SA)
8.4 FPS
Maestro (206MHz SA @ 236MHz)
10 FPS
Casio
Cassiopeia E-125 (150MHz MIPS)
6.8 FPS
Cassiopeia E-125 (150MHz MIPS @ 180MHz)
7.1 FPS
Cassiopeia E-125 (150MHz MIPS @ 200MHz)
7.3 FPS
Cassiopeia E-200 (206MHz SA)
8.9 FPS
Compaq \ HP
H1910 (200MHz XScale)
6.2 FPS
H1945 (266MHz Samsung)
14 FPS
H2215 (400MHz PXA255)
14.7 FPS
H2215 (400MHz PXA255 @ 530MHz)
18.5 FPS
H3630 (206MHz SA)
8.6 FPS
H3670 (206MHz SA)
8.9 FPS
H3670 (206MHz SA @ 221MHz)
9.6 FPS
H3835 (206MHz SA)
8.3 FPS
H3835 (236MHz SA @ 236MHz)
10.4 FPS
H3955 (400MHz XScale)
7.9 FPS
H4155 (400MHz PXA255, WM2003)
16.1 FPS
H5455 (400MHz XScale)
8.5 FPS
H5555 (400MHz PXA255)
14.0 FPS
Dell
Axim X5 (300MHz XScale @ 100MHz)
2.8 FPS
Axim X5 (300MHz XScale @ 200MHz)
5.8 FPS
Axim X5 Basic (300MHz XScale)
7.2 FPS
Axim X5 Basic (300MHz XScale, PPC2003)
12.5 FPS
Axim X5 Advanced (400MHz XScale)
7.8 FPS
Axim X5 Advanced (400MHz PXA255, PPC2003)
14.1 FPS
Axim X5 Advanced (600MHz PXA255, PPC2003)
17.6 FPS
Axim X30 (624MHz PXA270, PPC2003 SE)
24.2 FPS Portrait
18.5 FPS Landscape
Fujitsu-Siemens
Pocket Loox (400MHz XScale)
7.9 FPS
HP
Jornada 568 (206MHz SA)
8.5 FPS
Jornada 568 (206MHz SA @ 236MHz)
9.6 FPS
Jornada 720 (206MHz SA, HPC)
4 FPS - NEEDS CONFIRMATION
O2
XDA (206MHZ SA, WM2003)
11.1 FPS
Packard Bell
2060 (206MHz SA)
9.1 FPS
Toshiba
e330 (300MHz XScale)
7.5 FPS
e310 (206MHz SA)
7.8FPS
e550G (400MHz XScale)
8.2 FPS
e740 (400MHz XScale, old ROM)
7 FPS - NEEDS CONFIRMATION
e740 (400MHz XScale)
8.2 FPS
e740 (400MHz XScale @ 472MHz)
9.5 FPS
e750/e755 (400MHz PXA255)
10.3 FPS
e750/e755 (400MHz PXA255, WM2003)
14.9 FPS
e805 (400MHz PXA255, WM2003, QVGA)
15.3 FPS
e805 (400MHz PXA255, WM2003 SE, QVGA)
16 FPS
e805 (400MHz PXA255, WM2003 SE, VGA)
14.7 FPS
UR There
@migo (206MHz SA)
7.4 FPS
@migo (206 MHz SA @ 236MHz)
8.6 FPS
Yakumo
PDA Delta (200MHz XScale)
5.2 FPS
PDA Delta (200MHz XScale @ 300MHz)
7.6 FPS
Viewsonic
Viewsonic V36 (300MHz PXA255, WM2003)
15.6 FPS
Viewsonic V37 (400MHz XScale, PPC2002)
9.5 FPS
_________________
holy internets batman.
Last edited by sponge on Thu Dec 04, 2003 4:47 am; edited 29 times in total
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 14, 2002 5:36 am | Post subject: |
|
NinthOption
pm Member
Joined: 02 Dec 2002
Posts: 169
Location: Everywhere you want to be
|
Does anyone have a bench of PQ on a zarus?(I know there's a port)
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 14, 2002 5:41 pm | Post subject: |
|
sponge
Not sponge
Joined: 13 Jan 2002
Posts: 13073
Location: Connecticut, USA
|
Well damn.. when I edit the post, it becomes unsticky.. CURSE YOU POCKETMATRIX/phpBB!
_________________
holy internets batman.
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 14, 2002 9:43 pm | Post subject: |
|
James S
pm Insider
Joined: 12 Jan 2002
Posts: 17294
Location: Lexington, KY
|
I got it, don't worry, edit away. I'm here to serve.
_________________
<img src="http://home.comcast.net/~sonne/james/tag.gif">
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2002 4:12 am | Post subject: PocketQuake Benchmark Archive |
|
eminefes
pm Insider
Joined: 24 Jun 2001
Posts: 1354
Location: Jacksonville, Florida
|
sponge wrote:
Toshiba
e310 (206MHz SA)
7.8FPS - NEEDS CONFIRMATION
Here's your confirmation. 
My e310 did achieve 7.8fps.
_________________
Two cupcakes were in an oven. One turned to the other and said "Damn, it sure is hot in here" and the other one said "HOLY SHIT! A TALKING CUPCAKE!"
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2002 5:07 am | Post subject: |
|
sponge
Not sponge
Joined: 13 Jan 2002
Posts: 13073
Location: Connecticut, USA
|
Thanks. Has been fixed.
_________________
holy internets batman.
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2002 2:01 am | Post subject: |
|
Dan East
Site Admin
Joined: 25 Jan 2001
Posts: 5208
Location: Virginia, USA
|
It would be very good to have a set of landscape / fullscreen benchmarks as well for a couple reasons. In portrait mode less than 1/2 of the screen is blitted every frame (the onscreen controls and taskbar are not redrawn each frame), while in landscape the entire display is blitted each frame.
Also, the portrait mode uses a non-standard resolution that the PC version doesn't support. The landscape mode is 320x240, which corresponds to a PC version mode, for direct comparison.
Dan East
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2002 2:25 am | Post subject: |
|
James S
pm Insider
Joined: 12 Jan 2002
Posts: 17294
Location: Lexington, KY
|
sponge, are you up for the challenge?
_________________
<img src="http://home.comcast.net/~sonne/james/tag.gif">
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2002 8:01 pm | Post subject: |
|
Mali
pm Member
Joined: 28 Feb 2001
Posts: 81
|
results for asus a600 in landscape(right):
demo1.dem: 8.7 fps
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 23, 2002 11:41 pm | Post subject: |
|
sponge
Not sponge
Joined: 13 Jan 2002
Posts: 13073
Location: Connecticut, USA
|
Sure. The problem is, I skimmed (as in find, not read quickly) these benchmarks throughout the forum, and had no mention of orientation. But I'll update the results accordingly, even if it is all unknown orientations.
I thought the performance hit between landscape/portrait were minimal?
_________________
holy internets batman.
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 24, 2002 2:57 am | Post subject: |
|
James S
pm Insider
Joined: 12 Jan 2002
Posts: 17294
Location: Lexington, KY
|
Not at all! There is a HUGE difference. Check out the POLL Dan made in the General PPC Discussion forum for an indepth explanation.
_________________
<img src="http://home.comcast.net/~sonne/james/tag.gif">
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 24, 2002 3:12 am | Post subject: |
|
sponge
Not sponge
Joined: 13 Jan 2002
Posts: 13073
Location: Connecticut, USA
|
I see that, but I was always under the impression that PQ is CPU limited, not on the renderer as much as it is sound, AI, game logic and the such. Same reason as why you can pump up the resolution on games that are too slow on your PC, without making them slower. (ie RTCW on my old 233, almost the same fps with r_mipmap 1 and r_mipmap 4)
_________________
holy internets batman.
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 24, 2002 6:31 pm | Post subject: |
|
Robotbeat
pm Member
Joined: 28 Jan 2001
Posts: 880
Location: In your mind...
|
I can benchmark my e115!
On my e115, it doesn't really make much difference how detailed the textures are (until I get a memory over-run warning!), the performance seems to be about the same. Why don't we have Casio on that list?
When I get the chance, I'll bench my e115 Casio. I might as well hard-reset it, since it was recently hard-reset anyways.
See ya!
_________________
Die, Palm, Die. If that offended you, then get rid of your Palm OS device.
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 24, 2002 6:38 pm | Post subject: |
|
sponge
Not sponge
Joined: 13 Jan 2002
Posts: 13073
Location: Connecticut, USA
|
No Casios on that list simply because I couldn't find any :P
Try to reduce the changes as much as possible, and grab different benchmarks for portrait and landscape. Thanks for the support!
_________________
holy internets batman.
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 24, 2002 10:05 pm | Post subject: |
|
James S
pm Insider
Joined: 12 Jan 2002
Posts: 17294
Location: Lexington, KY
|
I think my Casio E-125 got 6.8FPS at 150MHz, at increased another 0.1FPS for every 10 MHz I overclocked. So at 180MHz I got 7.2, at 200 I received 7.5 I think.
I'm giving my E-125 to my 21 year old brother in Orlando as a Christmas present, so it's wrapped under the tree, thus I cannot benchmark it. But I'm 93% positive that those are the numbers for the Casio E-125. I'll add those numbers for the moment.
_________________
<img src="http://home.comcast.net/~sonne/james/tag.gif">
|
