This site is no longer active and is available for archival purposes only. Registration and login is disabled.

Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq


Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq

Postby Trenchtown007 » Dec 3, 2001 @ 8:03am

I bought my Casio on the Net for half the price of your regular Ipaq... My memory cards are way cooler and since Palm also switched to MMC format they'll get cheaper in no time...<br><br>And I hear the Ipaq screen sucks. Kind of an easy choice ey?<br>
Trenchtown007
 


Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq

Postby Luciano U. Werner » Dec 3, 2001 @ 11:22am

Thank you for the info.
Celerius quam asparagi cocuntur
__________________
DocSMRF
Tactical Advisor
User avatar
Luciano U. Werner
pm Insider
 
Posts: 3156
Joined: Aug 1, 2001 @ 9:41pm
Location: Brazil


Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq

Postby Matt Keys » Dec 3, 2001 @ 5:41pm

You guys crack me up.
Matt Keys
Co-Founder
PocketMatrix.com
User avatar
Matt Keys
Site Co-Founder
 
Posts: 3243
Joined: Jan 24, 2001 @ 7:29pm
Location: Michigan, USA


Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq

Postby RwGast » Dec 3, 2001 @ 5:51pm

Wow your so cool. So hows the slow piece of crap working out for you? You know you could have at least bought an e-125 then and only maybe then would i say your casio was even compareable to my ipaqs supperior speed.
http://www.angelfire.com/ego/esoteric if you like to play quake3 keep your eye on this site
User avatar
RwGast
pm Member
 
Posts: 1123
Joined: Jun 28, 2001 @ 7:36pm
Location: California, USA


Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq

Postby Jaybot » Dec 3, 2001 @ 6:22pm

uhmmm, except for the fact that the em500 is the exact same speed as the e-125; which can both be oc'ed to 200mhz.  only diff is the cf slot and the 32mb ram.
-------
|\\ //|
-- ^ --
|||
User avatar
Jaybot
pm Insider
 
Posts: 3208
Joined: Mar 22, 2001 @ 10:04pm
Location: Desk.


Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq

Postby Jaybot » Dec 3, 2001 @ 8:06pm

agreed.<br><br>the poor sap forgot to mention that the MIPS processor in his EM500 will only be suported for about 6 more months before it dies like the PSPCs did.
-------
|\\ //|
-- ^ --
|||
User avatar
Jaybot
pm Insider
 
Posts: 3208
Joined: Mar 22, 2001 @ 10:04pm
Location: Desk.


Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq

Postby RwGast » Dec 3, 2001 @ 8:12pm

oh, im sorry i thought the e-500 was slower. I guess not it just has less ram, i knew there was somthing that made the e-125 better. Still there is no need to post shit when your talking out your ass based on a personal opinion.
http://www.angelfire.com/ego/esoteric if you like to play quake3 keep your eye on this site
User avatar
RwGast
pm Member
 
Posts: 1123
Joined: Jun 28, 2001 @ 7:36pm
Location: California, USA


Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq

Postby RwGast » Dec 3, 2001 @ 8:13pm

!NotNew@EvilBugs.com
http://www.angelfire.com/ego/esoteric if you like to play quake3 keep your eye on this site
User avatar
RwGast
pm Member
 
Posts: 1123
Joined: Jun 28, 2001 @ 7:36pm
Location: California, USA


Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq

Postby Dan East » Dec 11, 2001 @ 9:21am

6 months? You're generous, Jaybot. :)<br><br>Dan East
User avatar
Dan East
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5264
Joined: Jan 25, 2001 @ 5:19pm
Location: Virginia, USA


Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq

Postby Paul » Dec 11, 2001 @ 9:27am

whats with the pic he posted?
Paul
pm Insider
 
Posts: 9835
Joined: Apr 2, 2001 @ 3:15pm
Location: California


Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq

Postby RwGast » Dec 11, 2001 @ 2:58pm

probably a picuture of himself, the ass.
http://www.angelfire.com/ego/esoteric if you like to play quake3 keep your eye on this site
User avatar
RwGast
pm Member
 
Posts: 1123
Joined: Jun 28, 2001 @ 7:36pm
Location: California, USA


Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq

Postby Luciano U. Werner » Dec 11, 2001 @ 3:26pm

Guys, give the poor sob a break. With that face he has to get a Palm.
Celerius quam asparagi cocuntur
__________________
DocSMRF
Tactical Advisor
User avatar
Luciano U. Werner
pm Insider
 
Posts: 3156
Joined: Aug 1, 2001 @ 9:41pm
Location: Brazil


Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq

Postby RwGast » Dec 11, 2001 @ 4:49pm

That was good :)
http://www.angelfire.com/ego/esoteric if you like to play quake3 keep your eye on this site
User avatar
RwGast
pm Member
 
Posts: 1123
Joined: Jun 28, 2001 @ 7:36pm
Location: California, USA


Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq

Postby OlManRivah » Dec 14, 2001 @ 4:14pm

The mips thingy is irrevelant.....anything you own today will be obsolete in 6 months.<br><br>I just prefer an obsolete E125....lol!
OlManRivah
 


Re: Casio EM-500 vs Ipaq

Postby Robby » Dec 30, 2001 @ 11:20am

i have an em500.  I'd rather have an E125 an day for CF and 32megs.  Personally i dont like normal ipaqs, but the new one is good.<br>That guy is just a fool
Why?
User avatar
Robby
pm Member
 
Posts: 418
Joined: Jul 30, 2001 @ 2:26pm
Location: Edenbridge


Next

Return to Windows Mobile


Sort


Forum Description

General Windows Mobile discussion for end-users. Hardware, software, etc. This is also the forum to post your product announcements and other news.

Moderators:

Dan East, sponge, Kevin Gelso, RICoder, Chris Edwards

Forum permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

cron