[dumb/wannby's nerd topic] Why not a CF 3D card?
Posted: Apr 24, 2003 @ 4:58pm
PocketMatrix
Mobile device developer community
http://pocketmatrix.com/forums/
[dumb/wannby's nerd topic] Why not a CF 3D card?
Page 1 of 6
Posted: Apr 24, 2003 @ 4:58pmPosted: Apr 24, 2003 @ 5:15pmPosted: Apr 24, 2003 @ 5:27pmPosted: Apr 24, 2003 @ 6:27pmPosted: Apr 24, 2003 @ 6:32pmPosted: Apr 24, 2003 @ 6:36pmPosted: Apr 24, 2003 @ 6:55pmPosted: Apr 24, 2003 @ 7:35pmPosted: Apr 24, 2003 @ 8:30pmPosted: Apr 24, 2003 @ 8:48pmThey're very useful for arguments, but only when people like you don't point them out
Posted: Apr 24, 2003 @ 9:04pmActually, I just calculated. If you had 256-bit mem running at 28 GHz, you'd have 450gb/s bandwidth.
Posted: Apr 24, 2003 @ 9:48pmGeez... you say it as if a FPU could do miracles!
It can't! And no matter how powerfull that FPU could be, it would never be as fast and effective as a dedicated 2d/3d chip.
That's why no ppc is faster than E740 at video decoding.
btw, AGP 3.0 also known as AGP 8x has a bandwidth of 2.1Gb/s, a little bit inferior to those 450Gb/s..
If you were talking about the bandwith between the graphics card and its ram, then the card with highest bandwidth is the Radeon 9800 Pro, wich has about 21Gb/s.
It can't! And no matter how powerfull that FPU could be, it would never be as fast and effective as a dedicated 2d/3d chip.
That's why no ppc is faster than E740 at video decoding.
btw, AGP 3.0 also known as AGP 8x has a bandwidth of 2.1Gb/s, a little bit inferior to those 450Gb/s..
If you were talking about the bandwith between the graphics card and its ram, then the card with highest bandwidth is the Radeon 9800 Pro, wich has about 21Gb/s.
Posted: Apr 24, 2003 @ 9:54pmPosted: Apr 24, 2003 @ 10:27pmPosted: Apr 24, 2003 @ 10:37pm