This site is no longer active and is available for archival purposes only. Registration and login is disabled.

S-Video vs Vanilla Video


S-Video vs Vanilla Video

Postby Dan East » May 15, 2001 @ 7:29pm

User avatar
Dan East
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5264
Joined: Jan 25, 2001 @ 5:19pm
Location: Virginia, USA


Re: S-Video vs Vanilla Video

Postby Diego Cueva » May 15, 2001 @ 9:06pm

--------------------------

Last modification: Diego Cueva - 04/31/03 at 17:32:04
I´m currently listening to my PC´s fan
SMRF founder
Peace
User avatar
Diego Cueva
pm Insider
 
Posts: 2582
Joined: Mar 28, 2001 @ 9:06pm
Location: D.I.G. Secret Headquarters, Brazil


Re: S-Video vs Vanilla Video

Postby Dan East » May 15, 2001 @ 9:20pm

User avatar
Dan East
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5264
Joined: Jan 25, 2001 @ 5:19pm
Location: Virginia, USA


Re: S-Video vs Vanilla Video

Postby Moose or Chuck » May 15, 2001 @ 9:38pm

Moose or Chuck
 


Re: S-Video vs Vanilla Video

Postby Dan East » May 15, 2001 @ 9:51pm

User avatar
Dan East
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5264
Joined: Jan 25, 2001 @ 5:19pm
Location: Virginia, USA


Re: S-Video vs Vanilla Video

Postby Dick Gozinya » May 15, 2001 @ 10:42pm

Dan:<br><br>S-Video Simply put, The Colors don't bleed into eachother.<br><br>It's Not exactly RGB/SCART, but it kills standard vanilla connections.<br><br>999<br><br>
Dick Gozinya
 


Re: S-Video vs Vanilla Video

Postby SonicSilicon » May 16, 2001 @ 11:01am

Plus you get more resolution. On composite (the RCA connector) you can get about 540 vertical lines [i.e. horizontal resolution] (forgive me if I'm getting this wrong, my NTSC knowledge is a bit hazy.) On Y/C (S-Video) you get around 720. Sometimes you'll also get an increase in horizontal lines [,vertical resolution,] but usually that's more dependant on the source of the video.<br><br>As stated before, the main purpose is to prevent color bleed / smearing. That's when you get "flanges" or "fingers" of color where it doesn't belong, most often red. S-Video also decreases the ammount of dot-crawl (a "marching-ants"-like effect) around edges of sharp contrast in color or brightness. Lastly it increases color accuracy (as color is defines as how far a hue is away from green either clockwise or conter-clockwise on a color wheel.)<br><br>I have to say tat I persoanlly couldn't stand watching plain old composite video if Y/C (Luminance/Chrominance) is available. As Moose said, it isn't VGA, or even composite video. It is, however, substantionally cheaper than most other higher quality video cabling. Just yesterday I was poking around Electronic Boutique's brink-n-mortar store at the mall and saw a S-Video and RCA Stereo breakout cable for the Playstations (yes, it works on all of them) for just $10 (it was made by Interact.) (Great, now I'm really tempted to buy a PSone...)
User avatar
SonicSilicon
pm Member
 
Posts: 204
Joined: Mar 7, 2001 @ 1:36pm


Re: S-Video vs Vanilla Video

Postby SonicSilicon » May 16, 2001 @ 11:05am

D'oh! On the hortizontal resolution (vertical lines) that's for the lines visible. Actual resolutions would be 640 for composite and 800 for Y/C. What you don't see gets lost behind the bezel (case.) This was an old compensation when the yokes on the picture tube would get weaker over time and shrink the image.
User avatar
SonicSilicon
pm Member
 
Posts: 204
Joined: Mar 7, 2001 @ 1:36pm


Re: S-Video vs Vanilla Video

Postby Dan East » May 17, 2001 @ 9:49am

Okay, I've got my new TV fired up, and there definitely is a huge difference with the S-Video! It is most noticable on static images, like the program guide of my DSS. If I switch back and forth between S-Video and Line I can really see the improvement. The DSS and DVD really make the VHS look like total crap. I'm to the point that I can't stand to watch anything that's not digital. :)<br>Now my next problem. The TV only has one S-Video input. However I want to at least hook up my DVD and DSS with S-Video, with the possible addition of game consoles, my laptop, etc. I assume there are S-Video A/B switches? Any recommendations? My VCR doesn't support S-Video, so I can't use it for a switchbox.<br><br>Dan East
User avatar
Dan East
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5264
Joined: Jan 25, 2001 @ 5:19pm
Location: Virginia, USA


Re: S-Video vs Vanilla Video

Postby SonicSilicon » May 17, 2001 @ 10:47am

The cheapest way out of the switching problem is to get a S-Video coupler (female-female connector.) Attach it to a cable that runs to the back of the television and just hook up whatever you want to use at the moment to the other side.<br><br>Of course that's a pain to use, but I've never used a switchbox, and barely know what to look for in specifications. I'll try asking my dad, but he seems to detest the things.
User avatar
SonicSilicon
pm Member
 
Posts: 204
Joined: Mar 7, 2001 @ 1:36pm


Re: S-Video vs Vanilla Video

Postby Moose or Chuck » May 17, 2001 @ 12:09pm

I'll ask my daddy too :)
Moose or Chuck
 


Return to Windows Mobile


Sort


Forum Description

General Windows Mobile discussion for end-users. Hardware, software, etc. This is also the forum to post your product announcements and other news.

Moderators:

Dan East, sponge, Kevin Gelso, RICoder, Chris Edwards

Forum permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum