Page 1 of 2
ASUS a730 benchmarks? How fast really (for VGA)?

Posted:
Sep 28, 2004 @ 5:10am
by VGA

Posted:
Sep 28, 2004 @ 5:24am
by Matt Keys

Posted:
Sep 28, 2004 @ 5:46am
by VGA

Posted:
Sep 28, 2004 @ 12:42pm
by Kevin Gelso
IMO those benchmarks are sub par performance. They are not running at the 'next generation performance' like the Dell Axim X30, and the HP Ipaq hx4700.

Posted:
Sep 28, 2004 @ 12:54pm
by VGA
LOL seriously?? I don't get it. Why would ASUS make it that way? What for? So the Dell X50 and iPAQ should be faster? I don't get it...

Posted:
Sep 28, 2004 @ 12:57pm
by VGA
I don't know if I am willing to shell out $600 or more for ASUS if all it's going to be is a low performer... if that will be the case, then $400 and $500 for the ASUS a730W is a good price. I don't want to pay for a low performer. (but the face that it is smal and has a camera makes it cool though)...

Posted:
Sep 28, 2004 @ 4:34pm
by Guest

Posted:
Sep 28, 2004 @ 11:09pm
by VGA
Wrong. No one is whining. I think the Dell X50 is supposed to be about the same size as the a730...right?

Posted:
Sep 28, 2004 @ 11:14pm
by VGA
But for QVGA apps and games, I guess according to those benchmarks, it is a pretty fast device. Pretty much the same as the a620... But I guess no one still knows if those benchmarks are for QVGA or VGA?

Posted:
Sep 29, 2004 @ 12:25am
by sponge
Could you please combine all your thoughts into one post instead of throwing them everywhere?

Posted:
Sep 29, 2004 @ 12:58am
by tomdon
I was just thinking that.

Posted:
Sep 29, 2004 @ 3:36am
by VGA

Posted:
Sep 29, 2004 @ 3:37am
by VGA

Posted:
Sep 29, 2004 @ 4:57am
by sponge

Posted:
Sep 29, 2004 @ 5:56am
by VGA