Updates

by **PointOfLight** » Sep 16, 2004 @ 4:34am

Hey, as long as you fix it in the end, it's all good. Besides, we knew what to expect getting into this. That's why it's called beta. Not to mention the fact that even with the breaks you keep adding new features.

by **mervjoyce** » Sep 16, 2004 @ 10:46am

by **PointOfLight** » Sep 16, 2004 @ 1:46pm

by **kornalius** » Sep 16, 2004 @ 5:59pm

New pre-release is available. Have fun!

by **PointOfLight** » Sep 16, 2004 @ 7:54pm

by **kornalius** » Sep 16, 2004 @ 7:59pm

by **PointOfLight** » Sep 16, 2004 @ 8:04pm

by **kornalius** » Sep 16, 2004 @ 9:11pm

I'll look into it. Certainly not something I want. The other way is what I have implemented ie:

proc test
return (value);
end;

proc main
s$ = test;
end;

This was possible before, but now it is not.

by **PointOfLight** » Sep 16, 2004 @ 9:17pm

That actually makes sense, though. I wouldn't expect a proc to return a value. My problem is that I tend to make everything func, even though I don't necessarily need to, and a bunch of code was blowing up because I called funcs without assigning them to anything.

by **kornalius** » Sep 16, 2004 @ 10:06pm

Don't worry it will be fixed tomorrow!

Updates

Sort

Forum Description

Moderator:

Forum permissions