Convert VB. Net to Visual C++ .Net?

by **refractor** » Sep 17, 2004 @ 12:37pm

Actually, no, they'll both run slowly. So far as I know, VB.NET and VC++.NET are both compiled down to the CLR and then interpreted on the machine that's running it.

I've never done a comparison as my device isn't .NET capable, but I'd expect the (managed) .NET executables to be significantly slower than a "real" C++ executable.

by **VGA** » Sep 17, 2004 @ 3:19pm

by **Conan** » Sep 17, 2004 @ 10:38pm

by **VGA** » Sep 17, 2004 @ 11:15pm

by **VGA** » Sep 18, 2004 @ 5:10am

by **Mr X** » Sep 18, 2004 @ 5:56am

by **VGA** » Sep 18, 2004 @ 6:49am

Visual Studio 2005 is out already for sale? What's the difference?

by **Conan** » Sep 18, 2004 @ 6:52am

re: assembler yes I was refering to PocketPC. There seem to be quite a few people going that way for performance. As one who has written entire games in assembler I know it can be as easy to use as C so long as you document like mad but you have to make up all your own constructs as structs, classes etc exist in C++ but not assembler where there's none of the higher level niceties.

by **Mr X** » Sep 18, 2004 @ 6:56am

by **VGA** » Sep 18, 2004 @ 7:23am

by **refractor** » Sep 18, 2004 @ 7:50am

by **VGA** » Sep 18, 2004 @ 7:58am

Convert VB. Net to Visual C++ .Net?

Convert VB. Net to Visual C++ .Net?

Sort

Forum Description

Moderators:

Forum permissions