Component missing

[willywig]

When I try to run Pocketquake on my HP jornada 690 i get is saying that one of the components are missing how do i fix this all the files are in the right spots acording to the readme file

[Moose or Chuck]

PocketQuake currently doesn't run on the HP Jornada 690. It is only programmed to work on PocketPCs, and an alpha test version is currently in working form for the Jornada 720. Sorry

[RwGast]

Why the hell doesnt it work on handhelds do they run ce 2.11 or somthing. I mean anyone can port it to diffrent proccesors easly, so i am assuming these all do not run ec 3.0. Also i was wondering does pq work on jornada 54x or whatever those pocket pc's are called, i almost bought one instead of my ipaq. <br><br>Note:<br>This wasnt intended as a post to bug about pq ports i just wanna know why pq doesnt run on jornadas to easly.

[Moose or Chuck]

I'm sure Dan East will want to know how easy it is to compile for different devices. Maybe you should tell him how easy it is. I'm sure you could help him out, since he needs so much help. You obviously know how to make it work on different devices easily. Maybe you could port it to my 5160 Nokia cell phone? Or my TI-86? Maybe my dreamcast memory card?<br><br>~~~

[Moose or Chuck]

yes VMU QUAKE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[RwGast]

Well as you all told me before its quite simple just pick your proccessor out of vc++ drop down box. No reason to be rude over a question.

[RwGast]

Sorry if it sounded like i was trying to be an ass but i just asked a question. There was no reason to get pissed how about instead of telling me that if im that good blah blah, you tell me why its so hard to port wich was my question.

[randall]

It doesn't run because they didn't have GAPI (until now) which required WinCE 3.0.<br><br>It runs on the jornada 54X, but very jumpy.<br><br>It sounds like the 720 is getting about the same framerates as the Jornada PocketPC.

[Dan East]

When the first Windows CE devices were released at version 1.0, they contained a very small subset of the Windows and ANSI-C libraries. With each release of Windows CE more routines have been supported. Quake uses routines only available with Pocket PC and HPC-Pro devices. Someone is working on filling these deficiencies at this time.<br>Regardless of all of that, to my knowledge, no CE 2.0 device had a processor over 100mhz, they were all greyscale, and had at most 8 MB Ram. In other words they do not have hardware capable of running Quake in the first place. Does anyone know otherwise? That is, does a CE 2.0 device exist with 16 MB RAM, and have a 100mhz+ processor?<br><br>Dan East

[Moose or Chuck]

randall, so far no one has tested it with a good .cfg file. I'm betting that it will get the same framerate as the iPaq, because it has the same processor and RAM, along with some other better features the iPaq is lacking.

[R0B]

[Dan East]

[R0B]

Those frame rates are with moose's config file.<br><br>What are the IPAQ frame rates, both overclocked and not overclocked.Last modification: Rob - 07/12/01 at 11:03:50

[Dan East]

From Matt Keys with an @migo:<br>OK i ran the test again this time with no config file or autoexec. the results: <br><br>206 MHz: 7.4FPS <br>236 MHz: 8.6FPS<br><br>Ok, I threw 999's config in there and I got these results... <br><br>206MHz: 969 frames in 109 seconds, 8.9 FPS <br>236MHz: 969frames in 94.8 seconds, 10.2 FPS<br><br>From PepeGG with an iPaq:<br>236 mhz: 9.8FPS<br><br><br>Those are the only recent benchmarks I could find. We need to generate some new ones with 0.062...<br><br>Dan East<br>

[R0B]

How does 999's config file compare to Moose's, and where can I get it to try it out on the 720?