This site is no longer active and is available for archival purposes only. Registration and login is disabled.

Pocket Loox Performance Test


Pocket Loox Performance Test

Postby David Horn » Aug 28, 2002 @ 1:12pm

Crosswind technique: "Using your peripheral vision, react to body movements, gasps, groans, and shouts from the other side of the cockpit, and always remember that it's better to be lucky than good."
User avatar
David Horn
<b>The Boss</b>
 
Posts: 1867
Joined: Feb 17, 2002 @ 2:10pm
Location: PocketGamer Towers (New York, Paris, Leeds)


Postby James S » Aug 28, 2002 @ 4:29pm

<img src="http://home.comcast.net/~sonne/james/tag.gif">
James S
pm Insider
 
Posts: 17064
Joined: Jan 12, 2002 @ 2:33pm
Location: Lexington, KY


Postby David Horn » Aug 28, 2002 @ 8:37pm

Crosswind technique: "Using your peripheral vision, react to body movements, gasps, groans, and shouts from the other side of the cockpit, and always remember that it's better to be lucky than good."
User avatar
David Horn
<b>The Boss</b>
 
Posts: 1867
Joined: Feb 17, 2002 @ 2:10pm
Location: PocketGamer Towers (New York, Paris, Leeds)


Postby James S » Aug 28, 2002 @ 9:57pm

Read about the Zayo Xscale pocket pc. It gets 56fps in PocketTV, whereas the iPaq XScale gets 22fps. I'm pretty sure that optimizations are on the way...
<img src="http://home.comcast.net/~sonne/james/tag.gif">
James S
pm Insider
 
Posts: 17064
Joined: Jan 12, 2002 @ 2:33pm
Location: Lexington, KY


Postby Mike Bannick » Aug 29, 2002 @ 2:45am

oh well the human eye can only recognise 30 fps :P
The president has been kidnapped by ninjas.
User avatar
Mike Bannick
pm Insider
 
Posts: 1573
Joined: Feb 2, 2002 @ 9:13am
Location: Loveland, Colorado


Postby James S » Aug 29, 2002 @ 3:52am

I know I can recognize up to 120FPS. I know if Q3 drops below 90FPS when I'm playing online. 45 is just horrible, I don't even want to think about it. My monitor refresh at 140Hz, too, just in case you were wondering.
<img src="http://home.comcast.net/~sonne/james/tag.gif">
James S
pm Insider
 
Posts: 17064
Joined: Jan 12, 2002 @ 2:33pm
Location: Lexington, KY


Postby TechMage » Aug 29, 2002 @ 4:49am

I got my Jornada 568 to play Quake at 9.6 FPS with JS Overclock.

Maybe that new Asus Pocket PC will run Quake at 15 FPS. That would kick arse. :)
User avatar
TechMage
pm Insider
 
Posts: 2223
Joined: Sep 16, 2001 @ 5:40pm
Location: In Your Head


Postby benkenobi0 » Aug 29, 2002 @ 5:03am

Hey, how can you tell how fast it's running, I want to compare stuff with a friend.
benkenobi0
pm Insider
 
Posts: 1278
Joined: Apr 11, 2002 @ 2:15am


Postby TechMage » Aug 29, 2002 @ 9:32am

User avatar
TechMage
pm Insider
 
Posts: 2223
Joined: Sep 16, 2001 @ 5:40pm
Location: In Your Head


Postby Guest » Aug 29, 2002 @ 7:09pm

on the asus my pal quake runs at 10.3 fps.
Guest
 


Postby mali. » Aug 29, 2002 @ 7:09pm

on the asus my pal quake runs at 10.3 fps.
mali.
 


Postby James S » Aug 29, 2002 @ 9:48pm

sounds genuine to me.
<img src="http://home.comcast.net/~sonne/james/tag.gif">
James S
pm Insider
 
Posts: 17064
Joined: Jan 12, 2002 @ 2:33pm
Location: Lexington, KY


Postby Guest » Sep 5, 2002 @ 5:20pm

Guest
 


Postby James S » Sep 5, 2002 @ 8:53pm

It gets 10.3FPS on the Asus MyPal A600. The Asus has no special video chip inside of it, that's the ATI Imageon inside Toshiba's e740 and it actually makes it run slower.
<img src="http://home.comcast.net/~sonne/james/tag.gif">
James S
pm Insider
 
Posts: 17064
Joined: Jan 12, 2002 @ 2:33pm
Location: Lexington, KY


Postby sponge » Sep 5, 2002 @ 8:57pm

I believe the new devices use a hardware blitter, or something to that effect, that takes off quite a bit of load from the processor. According to jadam, Imageon speed ups are on the way.. but you can never be sure wtf jadam is talking about :P

The human eye can see 60 FPS, though tests have found the "sweet spot" to be 60-90FPS. Anyone that says higher probably is more of a placebo type thing. Most monitors refresh at 60hz, though people who know what they're doing will have it at 85hz, so it's drawing no more than 85 frames a second. Usually getting a refresh rate over 85hz is hard in higher resolutions.

If the video card/driver was for a 3D card, you'd be right. But here the processor is doing ALL the work, and anything to take the load off the processor will speed it up.
holy internets batman.
User avatar
sponge
Not sponge
 
Posts: 12779
Joined: Jan 13, 2002 @ 8:04am
Location: New Hampshire


Next

Return to Pocket Quake 1 and 2


Sort


Forum Description

Discuss Pocket Quake 1 and 2 by Dan East

Moderators:

Dan East, sponge, James S

Forum permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum