by Warren » Aug 27, 2001 @ 4:25pm
My aunt and her wife (I'm not getting into that) each have a Palm V, and they SUCK ASSSSSS! What's 33Mhz compared to 150Mhz? And a "digital" black and white (not even gray scale) screen compared to 64,000 colors? And 4Mb compared to 16Mb (I have 80Mb total with MMC card)? But the thing that is similar, the price! Both around $400!! Who would be stupid enough to get a Palm over a Casio or iPAQ? <br><br>I think more people get Palms over PPCs, because stores don't really carry PPCs. I've only seen the EM-500 once, at one Circuit City (where I got mine), otherwise, it's all Palms and Handsprings. The other day at Circuit City, they had a million Palms and Handsprings, which you could test, 1 iPAQ, 1 E-125, and 1 HP, which none of the PPCs you could test. I told the person that they weren't working, so he plugged them in, and I got to test them. The E-125 is the same thing as my EM-500. The iPAQ is a little faster in loading programs, but there's too many stupid help and "user-friendly" programs in it, and the screen is not as good as the Casio's. And the HP is well, sorry, it's crap. The refresh on the screen was HORRIBLE! When the screen changes, you still see the original screen for a 1 second or 2. I can't see how you play a game on it.<br><br>Has anyone tried the NEW COLOR Palm m505!! Palm finally realized that people are not color blind (that's what you get from a company ran by dumb dogs). The Palm IIIce was the real first COLOR one, but that sucked so much!! I just tested the NEW m505, and it's not much different. Refresh is as bad as the HP, and it just sucks. <br><br>Palm. Embarrassing.