by James S » Nov 5, 2002 @ 6:33pm
You see, that's what I was affraid of. I didn't mean secular in such a religious way. I mean I did, but that's not the entire meaning I intended. Even religious people are becoming more secular, more concerned with worldly things. That doesn't necessitate immorality, of course. But what I was saying is that the concern for the things of the world has caused a "fast food, grab it now, forget consequences" type of attitude. People want to have a good time more than be responsible these days, even parents, which goes back to why kids these days are generally worse than the generation prior, and the generation prior to that. It's a continuing degredation, but it isn't seen that way because the current generation thinks they're "normal", the generation before them was "uptight", and the generation they spawn will be "raucous" but "that's okay because I was too."
Id' have to disagree about the bluring of class lines in the US. If you want a good read about people, social classes, minimum wage, and the poor in the United States, which make up the MAJORITY (as any rate below $12/hour is unliveable in today's economy) then you should read Nickel and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich (not sure about the spelling). It's an educational read, but I wasn't thrilled about how it read. I'm more into enteraining reading at the moment. That coupled with it being a school assignment lowered the enjoyment factor.
And I agree, class does have a big impact and there are exceptions, but I think that I believe there are more exceptions than you are allowing for, that's the only difference.
<img src="http://home.comcast.net/~sonne/james/tag.gif">