Page 1 of 1

A new low...

PostPosted: Aug 30, 2004 @ 10:19pm
by Caesar
My friend bases her argument against Bush on this: why does bush use past events to make a point?

Erm...shall he predict the future to prove points? :?

PostPosted: Aug 30, 2004 @ 10:21pm
by Kevin Gelso
Couldn't you put this in one of the already lively debates?

PostPosted: Aug 30, 2004 @ 10:29pm
by Maf54
Honestly I have found one big problem with politics of today; this may have been of many days past too. The politician’s speeches are about what the other one's platform is and how it's wrong. I want you to talk about your platform and why it's right.

PostPosted: Aug 30, 2004 @ 10:45pm
by Andy
I'd say about 0.1% of the population is capable of understanding a presidential agenda, even on an abstract level. Hell, I'll be the first to admit I don't understand a lot of it.

It's a lot easier (and more effective) to be the one flinging the mud.

PostPosted: Aug 30, 2004 @ 10:46pm
by RICoder
One would argue, Trae, that this Kerry is the one pushing the "He's WRONG!" agenda, and Bush is pushing his agenda and why it is the right one.

PostPosted: Aug 30, 2004 @ 10:48pm
by sponge
How convenient :P Though I do agree, I know all about what Bush is doing, but for all I've heard about Kerry, he could want to turn America into a rice farm.

PostPosted: Aug 30, 2004 @ 11:02pm
by Maf54

PostPosted: Aug 30, 2004 @ 11:06pm
by sponge

PostPosted: Aug 30, 2004 @ 11:43pm
by Maf54