Page 1 of 1
		
			
				A new low...
				
Posted: 
Aug 30, 2004 @ 10:19pmby Caesar
				My friend bases her argument against Bush on this: why does bush use past events to make a point? 
Erm...shall he predict the future to prove points?  

 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Aug 30, 2004 @ 10:21pmby Kevin Gelso
				Couldn't you put this in one of the already lively debates?
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Aug 30, 2004 @ 10:29pmby Maf54
				Honestly I have found one big problem with politics of today; this may have been of many days past too. The politician’s speeches are about what the other one's platform is and how it's wrong. I want you to talk about your platform and why it's right.
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Aug 30, 2004 @ 10:45pmby Andy
				I'd say about 0.1% of the population is capable of understanding a presidential agenda, even on an abstract level.  Hell, I'll be the first to admit I don't understand a lot of it.
It's a lot easier (and more effective) to be the one flinging the mud.
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Aug 30, 2004 @ 10:46pmby RICoder
				One would argue, Trae, that this Kerry is the one pushing the "He's WRONG!" agenda, and Bush is pushing his agenda and why it is the right one.
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Aug 30, 2004 @ 10:48pmby sponge
				How convenient :P Though I do agree, I know all about what Bush is doing, but for all I've heard about Kerry, he could want to turn America into a rice farm.
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Aug 30, 2004 @ 11:02pmby Maf54
				
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Aug 30, 2004 @ 11:06pmby sponge
				
			 
			
		
			
				
				
Posted: 
Aug 30, 2004 @ 11:43pmby Maf54