WMD yes or no?
Posted: Nov 1, 2004 @ 9:57pmPage 1 of 1
Posted: Nov 1, 2004 @ 9:57pmPosted: Nov 1, 2004 @ 10:15pmPosted: Nov 2, 2004 @ 5:15amPosted: Nov 2, 2004 @ 7:10amPosted: Nov 2, 2004 @ 2:38pmI didn't know about that. I'd say that's significant. You need a whole lot of unenriched uranium to get enriched uranium out of it.
Posted: Nov 2, 2004 @ 6:25pmDirty bombs only work in so far as making people scared. The initial blast would be deadlier than the small amount of nuclear poisoning. Additionally it is NOT a weapon of mass destruction. To make a dirty bomb big enough to be a weapon of mass destruction it would need an initial blast of the magnitude of a nuke.
Posted: Nov 2, 2004 @ 8:42pmPosted: Nov 2, 2004 @ 10:19pmPosted: Nov 2, 2004 @ 10:25pmPosted: Nov 2, 2004 @ 10:32pmPosted: Nov 2, 2004 @ 11:27pmTHE OLD FART OF THE FORUMS SAYS:
Bah, you kids...you don't know what good SNL is! The 70's was the best! BAH!
Seriously though, it has peaks and valleys. Like, when Chevy Chase, Dan Ackaroid (sp?) and those guys were on it was great...then it sucked...then Eddy Murphy saved it...then it sucked...then Dennis Miller, Phil Hartman and those guys came in and saved it...then it sucked...then the crew before this one was on, and they were OK, but not great, and now it sucks...
Bah, you kids...you don't know what good SNL is! The 70's was the best! BAH!
Seriously though, it has peaks and valleys. Like, when Chevy Chase, Dan Ackaroid (sp?) and those guys were on it was great...then it sucked...then Eddy Murphy saved it...then it sucked...then Dennis Miller, Phil Hartman and those guys came in and saved it...then it sucked...then the crew before this one was on, and they were OK, but not great, and now it sucks...