This site is no longer active and is available for archival purposes only. Registration and login is disabled.

US Students continue to decline in basic sciences


Re: US Students continue to decline in basic sciences

Postby jongjungbu » Nov 23, 2001 @ 1:54pm

CO2 means one carbon and two oxygen atoms, not molecules. An oxygen atom alone is generally unstable/highly reactive. Its most favored configuration is to couple itself with another Oxygen atom creating O2, a molecule. But CO2 is not deemed as a molecule of O2 combined with C because the stereochemical configuration is different. The oxygen atoms are no longer bound to one another in a molecule of CO2 but are each bound to the carbon. It thus becomes a totally separate and unique molecular entity. Not a combination of molecules. And why did I just go through all this. Bye. :)
User avatar
jongjungbu
Not JongJongBu
 
Posts: 3112
Joined: Jun 19, 2001 @ 4:22am
Location: USA


Re: US Students continue to decline in basic sciences

Postby MZGuy » Nov 23, 2001 @ 5:32pm

New bug!
User avatar
MZGuy
pm Insider
 
Posts: 1044
Joined: May 30, 2001 @ 11:45am
Location: Finland


Re: US Students continue to decline in basic sciences

Postby MooseMaster » Nov 23, 2001 @ 9:04pm

Okay, let's all post our IQ's now, that will be fun. I'm slightly proud of my IQ. Einstein only had an IQ of 123, tee hee.<br>*chants* I'm better than Einstein *repeat*<br><br>Who wants to post first?
MooseMaster
 


Re: US Students continue to decline in basic sciences

Postby Matt Keys » Nov 23, 2001 @ 10:28pm

Moose I belive your the only one who actually wants to post. So you can be first and last if you'd like.
Matt Keys
Co-Founder
PocketMatrix.com
User avatar
Matt Keys
Site Co-Founder
 
Posts: 3243
Joined: Jan 24, 2001 @ 7:29pm
Location: Michigan, USA


Re: US Students continue to decline in basic sciences

Postby MooseMaster » Nov 23, 2001 @ 10:52pm

kee hee, kee hee hee.<br>No I just saw someone post about how his IQ was in the 130's and I chuckled to myself, but the moment has past. I know longer care.
MooseMaster
 


Re: US Students continue to decline in basic sciences

Postby PDAFantast » Nov 24, 2001 @ 10:08am

PDAFantast.
PDAFantast
pm Member
 
Posts: 244
Joined: Jun 27, 2001 @ 4:00pm
Location: Malmö, Sweden


Re: US Students continue to decline in basic sciences

Postby MooseMaster » Nov 24, 2001 @ 10:13am

MooseMaster
 


Re: US Students continue to decline in basic sciences

Postby TechMage » Nov 25, 2001 @ 12:34am

User avatar
TechMage
pm Insider
 
Posts: 2223
Joined: Sep 16, 2001 @ 5:40pm
Location: In Your Head


Re: US Students continue to decline in basic sciences

Postby Jaybot » Nov 26, 2001 @ 4:34am

-------
|\\ //|
-- ^ --
|||
User avatar
Jaybot
pm Insider
 
Posts: 3208
Joined: Mar 22, 2001 @ 10:04pm
Location: Desk.


Re: US Students continue to decline in basic sciences

Postby Paul » Nov 26, 2001 @ 5:38am

Paul
pm Insider
 
Posts: 9835
Joined: Apr 2, 2001 @ 3:15pm
Location: California


Re: US Students continue to decline in basic sciences

Postby RICoder » Nov 26, 2001 @ 3:32pm

<iframe src="http://gamercard.xbox.com/RICoder.card" scrolling="no" frameBorder="0" height="140" width="204">RICoder</iframe>
User avatar
RICoder
FOX News Correspondent
 
Posts: 3948
Joined: Jul 10, 2001 @ 1:48pm
Location: the matrix has me


Previous

Return to Anything Discussion


Sort


Forum Description

Post all off-topic messages here, almost anything goes.

Moderators:

Dan East, sponge, David Horn, Kevin Gelso, RICoder

Forum permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum