Bug Report

[RICoder]

I would argue that if the idiot were to have been born without legs, then he would be an incomplete idiot.  To have lost them though, then Luc is correct, that is a maimed idiot.

[Diego Cueva]

This thread is sooooo stupid

[Paul]

thats a slightly generic statement given the threads on this forum.

[jongjungbu]

Well, if he was born without legs, then he would be complete. Because that's how he was born. That's how he was made.

[Paul]

but still an incomplete human being according to our genome

[RICoder]

and not necessarily and idiot...

[Luciano U. Werner]

What's genome have to do with it?<br>The poor bastard was maimed.

[Paul]

he was BORN without legs right? his genes messed up then, right?

[RICoder]

<br>but I thought we established that the 'idiot' was not maimed, but a victim of birth defects...

[Paul]

yup

[Luciano U. Werner]

No, his genes are fine.<br>Let's suppose his momma took some teratogenic drugs (like talidomid, for instance). His genes would be fine. They just couldn't "express" themselves correctly.

[jongjungbu]

his genes would be incomplete, not him...and therefore, its not his idiocy that is incomplete. however, now that i think about it...if his genes are the problem..then perhaps he could be an amaurotic idiot then rather than an incomplete one.

[Moose or Chuck]

You're all idiots and you've definitely got something missing!

[Paul]

teeheehee! oh you're so funny mister sonne!

[Village_Ideot]

geez, i missed it<br><br>a whole thread about idiots, and i didn't get something about ideots in.<br><br>geez, the quick or the left out of the posts.<br><br>err...yeah.