This site is no longer active and is available for archival purposes only. Registration and login is disabled.

Feedback on x86 emulator


Re: Feedback on x86 emulator

Postby Digby » Aug 11, 2001 @ 5:00pm

From comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video FAQ...<br><br>The VGA modes are:<br><br>Mode      Type      Resolution      Chars      Colors      <br>(Hex)<br>0,1      text      360x400            40x25      16<br>2,3      text      720x400            80x25      16<br>4,5      gfx      320x200            40x25      4<br>6      gfx      640x200            80x25      2<br>7      text      720x400            80x25      mono<br>D      gfx      320x200            40x25      16<br>E      gfx      640x200            80x25      16<br>F      gfx      640x350            80x25      mono<br>10      gfx      640x350            80x25      16<br>11      gfx      640x480            80x30      2<br>12      gfx      640x480            80x30      16<br>13      gfx      320x200            40x25      256<br>
Digby
pm Insider
 
Posts: 1011
Joined: Apr 29, 2001 @ 1:53pm


Dan is cool

Postby Robotbeat » Aug 19, 2001 @ 12:30am

*******/\/\/\/\/\/B-U-M-P\/\/\/\/\/\*******
Die, Palm, Die. If that offended you, then get rid of your Palm OS device.
User avatar
Robotbeat
pm Member
 
Posts: 827
Joined: Jan 28, 2001 @ 4:52pm
Location: In your mind...


Re: Feedback on x86 emulator

Postby Jaybot » Aug 19, 2001 @ 4:14pm

It's completely unecessary to BUMP something that's already on the first page; and hasnt left the front page since the threads conception.
-------
|\\ //|
-- ^ --
|||
User avatar
Jaybot
pm Insider
 
Posts: 3208
Joined: Mar 22, 2001 @ 10:04pm
Location: Desk.


Re: Feedback on x86 emulator

Postby Robotbeat » Aug 19, 2001 @ 5:58pm

Good point, maybe more people should read it! Here, I'll /\BUMP/\ it for ya! ;)
Die, Palm, Die. If that offended you, then get rid of your Palm OS device.
User avatar
Robotbeat
pm Member
 
Posts: 827
Joined: Jan 28, 2001 @ 4:52pm
Location: In your mind...


Re: Feedback on x86 emulator

Postby Nick I. » Aug 20, 2001 @ 1:10am

Hey Dan,<br><br>did you get the SI benchmark prog I sent you?  What scores did ya get?
Nick I.
 


Re: Feedback on x86 emulator

Postby Dan East » Aug 20, 2001 @ 1:43am

I got it, and have tried it, but I need to modify the key mappings. Arrows keys don't work in Pocket Bochs at the moment, and I can't get an actual benchmark without navigating with them. The software seems to run fine under Bochs so far.<br><br>Dan East
User avatar
Dan East
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5264
Joined: Jan 25, 2001 @ 5:19pm
Location: Virginia, USA


Re: Feedback on x86 emulator

Postby Jack Smythe » Aug 20, 2001 @ 10:31am

Hi,<br><br>I'm quite interested in the Bochs port for Windows CE, as I have some x86 programs that don't work under PocketDOS.<br><br>However, the Bochs CPU emulation would have to be dramatically optimised if it was going to be of any use on a Pocket PC.<br><br>I've benchmarked the Win32 version of PocketDOS against the Win32 version of Bochs on several Pentium II and Pentium III machines and have found PocketDOS to be 5-15x faster than Bochs. <br><br>I used several benchmark programs I got from Simtel. One of the benchmarks measures MIPS:<br><br>Bochs-1.2.1 = 1.09 MIPS<br>PocketDOS 1.03 (Win32) = 11.57 MIPS<br>PocketDOS 1.03 (WinCE) = 2.74 MIPS<br><br>This was run on a 1Ghz Pentium III (Win32) and a 206Mhz Compaq iPaq (WinCE).<br><br>Jack
Jack Smythe
 


Re: Feedback on x86 emulator

Postby MZGuy » Aug 20, 2001 @ 10:45am

I think Bochs runs at 1MIPS by default and that by using this: "ips: 1000000" command in the bochsrc file you can set the emulated IPS. <br>Read more about this in the included bochsrc-sample.txt file.<br>My guess is that by rising the IPS you can get better benchmark results.
User avatar
MZGuy
pm Insider
 
Posts: 1044
Joined: May 30, 2001 @ 11:45am
Location: Finland


Re: Feedback on x86 emulator

Postby MZGuy » Aug 20, 2001 @ 11:09am

OLD!
User avatar
MZGuy
pm Insider
 
Posts: 1044
Joined: May 30, 2001 @ 11:45am
Location: Finland


Re: Feedback on x86 emulator

Postby rudy » Aug 20, 2001 @ 12:16pm

Guess you're going to have to get the arrow keys working sooner or later, but you can get to the benchmark without using the arrow keys.<br><br>Load SI using the switch /DEMO:<br>SI /DEMO<br><br>When it loads, just hit the Next button and it should do the CPU benchmark.
rudy
pm Member
 
Posts: 81
Joined: Aug 20, 2001 @ 12:16pm


Re: Feedback on x86 emulator

Postby Jack Smythe » Aug 20, 2001 @ 12:33pm

Hi,<br><br>RTFM! Ok, I've played around with the IPS setting and have found that a value of 4000000 is about right for a 1Ghz PIII machine. However, as Bochs is obviously not synchronising its clock with a real-time clock, any benchmark run under Bochs is going to be meaningless...<br><br>Time to do some real-world tests...<br><br>Jack
Jack Smythe
 


Re: Feedback on x86 emulator

Postby Jack Smythe » Aug 21, 2001 @ 7:24am

Hi,<br><br>After doing some more testing (with a stopwatch), I've found that the Win32 version of Bochs runs at about 1/3 to 1/2 the speed of the Win32 version of PocketDOS. <br><br>On an iPaq, PocketDOS runs at about the same speed as a 20Mhz 80286 or a 10Mhz 80386. This indicates that Bochs might run at the same speed as a 7-10Mhz 80286 or a 3-5Mhz 80386 on an iPaq...<br>Jack
Jack Smythe
 


Re: Feedback on x86 emulator

Postby Dan East » Aug 23, 2001 @ 2:31am

Nick, it looks like SI performs some low-level floppy access that the FreeDos BIOS doesn't like. SI exits after it starts up with an "Unknown A: Command" error. After that, the OS is screwed, and the C: drive can't even be accessed. I noticed when I run SI on my laptop with W2k, the floppy grinds for a few seconds when it starts up, even though no disk is in the drive. So, SI must do some funky floppy stuff when it starts up.<br><br>Dan East
User avatar
Dan East
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5264
Joined: Jan 25, 2001 @ 5:19pm
Location: Virginia, USA


Re: Feedback on x86 emulator

Postby Dan East » Aug 23, 2001 @ 2:46am

I guess it's about time for another teaser.<br><br>Image<br><br>Unfortunately, the game locks up at this screen. :(<br><br>Dan East
User avatar
Dan East
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5264
Joined: Jan 25, 2001 @ 5:19pm
Location: Virginia, USA


Re: Feedback on x86 emulator

Postby Robotbeat » Aug 23, 2001 @ 12:12pm

I can't wait. I want it now. Please? Pretty please?
Die, Palm, Die. If that offended you, then get rid of your Palm OS device.
User avatar
Robotbeat
pm Member
 
Posts: 827
Joined: Jan 28, 2001 @ 4:52pm
Location: In your mind...


PreviousNext

Return to Windows Mobile


Sort


Forum Description

A discussion forum for mobile device developers on the Windows Mobile platform. Any platform specific topics are welcome.

Moderators:

Dan East, sponge, Digby, David Horn, Kevin Gelso, RICoder

Forum permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum