Supply Side Economics: Boon or Bane?

by **Maf54** » Aug 12, 2004 @ 10:10pm

lol I meant saving the thread. How does saving a thread have to do with either Party's stance?

by **James S** » Aug 12, 2004 @ 10:29pm

My theory still resides. I was using the economy as an example to expound upon the idea.

by **Chris Edwards** » Aug 12, 2004 @ 10:33pm

by **Brig** » Aug 12, 2004 @ 10:58pm

by **Andy** » Aug 12, 2004 @ 11:04pm

by **Brig** » Aug 12, 2004 @ 11:13pm

by **Maf54** » Aug 13, 2004 @ 12:19am

by **James S** » Aug 13, 2004 @ 12:34am

by **BurningSheep** » Aug 13, 2004 @ 11:28am

But the chicken came out of an egg...

No, no need to explain a third time (not for me anyways, it was clear to me the first time). I think you have a point, although I'm not sure whether it's driven by the people with the largest financial influence or by the media. But you'll probably come back saying that the media is driven by the people with the largest financial influence anyways =]

About the start post, imo tax cuts basicly have two reasons. They make the person doing the tax cuts more popular. In short term that is, in long term the people might actually figure out they got worse off, but hey, by then the elections will be over anyways. It also makes the rich even richer, now I have nothing against people being rich, but it tends to go over the backs of the less fortunate.

by **warmi** » Aug 13, 2004 @ 4:45pm

by **Maf54** » Aug 13, 2004 @ 5:36pm

by **MrDownBoy** » Aug 13, 2004 @ 5:50pm

by **Maf54** » Aug 13, 2004 @ 6:01pm

by **BurningSheep** » Aug 13, 2004 @ 6:22pm

Supply Side Economics: Boon or Bane?

Sort

Forum Description

Moderators:

Forum permissions