This site is no longer active and is available for archival purposes only. Registration and login is disabled.

CNet == CrapNet


CNet == CrapNet

Postby Dan East » Aug 13, 2001 @ 10:47pm

CNet has an old version of PQ listed (0.03), without any links to the required pak file. So a bunch of people are having problems over there just trying to get it to work. So several weeks ago I submitted the latest version of PQ so they could update (0.03 only supported iPaq). They finally got back to me today, and sent the following:<br><br>The Download.com software library contains only those beta releases that are stable and functional enough for distribution to end users. We have determined that the beta program you submitted does not meet these criteria, and unfortunately we must decline to include it in our library. Please feel free to resubmit your program once it is out of beta.<br><br><br>Dan East
User avatar
Dan East
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5264
Joined: Jan 25, 2001 @ 5:19pm
Location: Virginia, USA


Re: CNet == CrapNet

Postby Malmer » Aug 13, 2001 @ 11:08pm

Thier download link points to:<br><br>http://www.pocketmatrix.com/pocketquake/PocketQuake.zip<br><br>Why not just replace that with the latest version? And write in the readme how to get pak files...
All your base are belong to us
User avatar
Malmer
pm Member
 
Posts: 768
Joined: Apr 26, 2001 @ 5:15pm
Location: Sweden


Re: CNet == CrapNet

Postby Chris Edwards » Aug 13, 2001 @ 11:10pm

because CNet is stupid;.
Chris Edwards
Founder
User avatar
Chris Edwards
Site Co-Founder
 
Posts: 4048
Joined: Jan 24, 2001 @ 7:14pm
Location: Vancouver, BC


Re: CNet == CrapNet

Postby Matt Keys » Aug 13, 2001 @ 11:37pm

well, you could do that, the point is that cnet is retarded though.
Matt Keys
Co-Founder
PocketMatrix.com
User avatar
Matt Keys
Site Co-Founder
 
Posts: 3243
Joined: Jan 24, 2001 @ 7:29pm
Location: Michigan, USA


Re: CNet == CrapNet

Postby Dan East » Aug 13, 2001 @ 11:45pm

I emailed them back and told them to either update it, or completely remove the Pocket Quake listing.<br><br>Dan East
User avatar
Dan East
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5264
Joined: Jan 25, 2001 @ 5:19pm
Location: Virginia, USA


Re: CNet == CrapNet

Postby Chris Edwards » Aug 14, 2001 @ 12:31am

dan... i did that a while ago..... they did nothing.<br><br>so i guess we will just sit back and enjoy our 5 cow rating on tucows :)...
Chris Edwards
Founder
User avatar
Chris Edwards
Site Co-Founder
 
Posts: 4048
Joined: Jan 24, 2001 @ 7:14pm
Location: Vancouver, BC


Re: CNet == CrapNet

Postby Moose or Chuck » Aug 14, 2001 @ 5:43pm

What you should do is deny CNet the right to distribute your file, that would solve all the problems. But deleting PocketQuake.zip and having a 404 page that just redirects instantly to the main PQ page is good.
Moose or Chuck
 


Re: CNet == CrapNet

Postby Chris Edwards » Aug 14, 2001 @ 5:47pm

or just using a htaccess redirect :)
Chris Edwards
Founder
User avatar
Chris Edwards
Site Co-Founder
 
Posts: 4048
Joined: Jan 24, 2001 @ 7:14pm
Location: Vancouver, BC


Re: CNet == CrapNet

Postby Moose or Chuck » Aug 14, 2001 @ 6:33pm

That's what I was talking about with the 404 error comment.
Moose or Chuck
 


Re: CNet == CrapNet

Postby esw » Aug 16, 2001 @ 4:56pm

esw
pm Member
 
Posts: 536
Joined: Jun 15, 2001 @ 5:57pm


Re: CNet == CrapNet

Postby Dan East » Aug 16, 2001 @ 10:20pm

User avatar
Dan East
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5264
Joined: Jan 25, 2001 @ 5:19pm
Location: Virginia, USA


Re: CNet == CrapNet

Postby TBone » Aug 16, 2001 @ 10:29pm

3V1L L337 H3150
User avatar
TBone
pm Member
 
Posts: 434
Joined: Jul 25, 2001 @ 10:12pm
Location: Fairfax, VA


Re: CNet == CrapNet

Postby Dan East » Aug 16, 2001 @ 11:18pm

User avatar
Dan East
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5264
Joined: Jan 25, 2001 @ 5:19pm
Location: Virginia, USA


Re: CNet == CrapNet

Postby Dan East » Nov 2, 2001 @ 9:03am

I think everyone will be pleased to know that CNet has returned my email. Lets see, I emailed them 8/13/01, and received a response on 10/30/01. That's a fast turn around of 75 days or so.<br><br>[sup]I have checked our submission queue and have not seen any update submitted from your company. I am hiding it from our site for the time being. Please log on to get an Upload.com account and submit your update. I will attend to it myself to make sure you get addressed in a timely manner.[/sup]<br><br>I would say he wouldn't be able to find it. I submitted it 2.5 months ago.<br><br>Dan East
User avatar
Dan East
Site Admin
 
Posts: 5264
Joined: Jan 25, 2001 @ 5:19pm
Location: Virginia, USA


Re: CNet == CrapNet

Postby randall » Nov 2, 2001 @ 7:56pm

User avatar
randall
pm Insider
 
Posts: 3426
Joined: Feb 23, 2001 @ 4:02pm
Location: Schnoogie


Return to Pocket Quake 1 and 2


Sort


Forum Description

Discuss Pocket Quake 1 and 2 by Dan East

Moderators:

Dan East, sponge, James S

Forum permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

cron