This site is no longer active and is available for archival purposes only. Registration and login is disabled.

Is there going to be a 1910 CF sleeve?


Postby James S » Jan 18, 2003 @ 8:28pm

<img src="http://home.comcast.net/~sonne/james/tag.gif">
James S
pm Insider
 
Posts: 17064
Joined: Jan 12, 2002 @ 2:33pm
Location: Lexington, KY


Postby wolfman » Jan 23, 2003 @ 6:04am

Well the way I see it they are going to be out in the cold anyway with dell making a 400MHz PDA with sd/mmc and CF slot only minus the builtin bluetooth, but no need for a sled for anything.

Just remember the iPaq may be slim but its wide and it can get very thick with a sled.
wolfman
pm Member
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Dec 11, 2002 @ 5:04am


Postby damian » Jan 23, 2003 @ 6:06am

yes, but the CF slot is most often (other than for memory) used for WiFi, thus making it not that required. The iPaq slot is SDIO anyway. I do agree, though, that $700 is a bit excessive.
damian
pm Insider
 
Posts: 3960
Joined: Sep 3, 2002 @ 7:59pm
Location: Acton, MA (home), NYC (school)


Postby James S » Jan 23, 2003 @ 6:28am

I got my iPaq H3955 because of the expandability. I love thin and really hate the iPaq's design, but it's the only one that offered the expandability options. The minute I saw a digital camera sleeve for the iPaq I was sold. And to my surprise I stumble upon a TV/FM Tuner sleeve for the iPaq! And many a GPS sleeve!

It may not be the greatest out there, as I readily admit, but it's definitely the most expandable, and that's what I'm looking for.
James S
pm Insider
 
Posts: 17064
Joined: Jan 12, 2002 @ 2:33pm
Location: Lexington, KY


Postby SiGen » Jan 23, 2003 @ 9:25am

User avatar
SiGen
Wants special tag
 
Posts: 1044
Joined: Apr 26, 2002 @ 4:30am
Location: Chihuahua, Mexico


Postby James S » Jan 23, 2003 @ 4:22pm

Ya, I'd tend to agree. You should have known what capabilities the device had before you bought it. Now you bought it and now you have it. It's not the time to ask questions about it, especially about things that you require for it and should have been curious about before you laid down the money.

But I'd be happy to see it all go to SD, as long as an SD Type II expansion were created for bigger and bulkier SD cards, such as wifi and bluetooth, so they don't have to have a projection sticking up and out of the device. And a single CF Sleeve could hold 5 SD Type II ports where one was available before.
James S
pm Insider
 
Posts: 17064
Joined: Jan 12, 2002 @ 2:33pm
Location: Lexington, KY


Postby SiGen » Jan 23, 2003 @ 8:02pm

you dont need 5 SD slots neither bulkier SD type II slots. SDIO can handle everything, specially with the surprise in CES of the new Combo WiFi/128MB Storage SDIO cards (and yes, they are as small as a normal SD card). and the expected price is $100-$200, thats not too expensive as i thought they could be. Now, poor poor iPAQ1910 users without SDIO (including me :P) but when i bought it, i knew it didnt have SDIO and a slow 200Mhz processor, so i cant whin :wink:
i like it as it is, or as i could be? with overclock utilities, and some news that brings hopes that every XScale device might have SDIO included, this device keeps being very cool, IMHO.

i think HP was very specific developing the iPAQ1910, they wanted a thin/small/light/simple/cheap price. if you add a sleeve or CF slot:
1)it wont be thin anymore
2)wont be small anymore
3)wont be light anymore
4)it wont be simple
5)sleeves cost $$$, so no cheap
User avatar
SiGen
Wants special tag
 
Posts: 1044
Joined: Apr 26, 2002 @ 4:30am
Location: Chihuahua, Mexico


Postby Michael Y » Jan 23, 2003 @ 10:27pm

User avatar
Michael Y
pm Insider
 
Posts: 1956
Joined: Feb 24, 2002 @ 2:27am


Postby DillRye » Jan 24, 2003 @ 10:10am

User avatar
DillRye
pm Insider
 
Posts: 477
Joined: Apr 25, 2002 @ 7:28am
Location: Iowa State University of Eng


Postby James S » Jan 24, 2003 @ 5:27pm

James S
pm Insider
 
Posts: 17064
Joined: Jan 12, 2002 @ 2:33pm
Location: Lexington, KY


Postby James S » Jan 24, 2003 @ 5:58pm

Wait wait wait. The Combo chips are based on this WLAN6060 SD Card by SyChip. I'd have to say that it protrudes fairly far.

James S
pm Insider
 
Posts: 17064
Joined: Jan 12, 2002 @ 2:33pm
Location: Lexington, KY


Postby Mechcommander » Jan 25, 2003 @ 9:21pm

Well, think of it this way:
nVidia uses the crippled GeForce4 MX's for the low-end computer user, while the TI's are reserved for buyers who want really good performance for a modest price. [analogy] HP does pretty much the same thing; only without total the suckiness of an MX. [/analogy]
The 19xx is a good device for people who want a PDA for a little gaming, and a lot of functions that the traditional PDA was supposed to be. HP crippled the built-in software bundle (As I checked at OfficeMax today), and as Sponge said, possibly the proccesor.
In short: I would not recommend the new iPAQ's. They remind me too much of the MX way of doing things.
The Dell definetly has the best bang for the buck. (It also has built-in CF and SD, too)
Image
User avatar
Mechcommander
pm Insider
 
Posts: 1323
Joined: Jul 1, 2002 @ 10:46pm
Location: Fort Collins, CO


Previous

Return to Windows Mobile


Sort


Forum Description

General Windows Mobile discussion for end-users. Hardware, software, etc. This is also the forum to post your product announcements and other news.

Moderators:

Dan East, sponge, Kevin Gelso, RICoder, Chris Edwards

Forum permissions

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

cron